flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicholas Kwiatkowski <nicholaskwiatkow...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC3
Date Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:52:50 GMT
+1 (binding)

Java 1.7
OS: W10_x64

Source kit signatures match: y
Source kit builds: y
README is ok: y
RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y

No unapproved licenses or archives: y
No unapproved binaries: y

Binary kit signatures match: y
NOTICE is ok: y
LICENSE is ok: y
No unapproved licenses or archives in binary package: y
No unapproved binaries in binary package: y


ASDoc seems correct.  Ran it against my suite of applications and it seems
good as well.  SWF output, and AIR desktop/mobile output.  Tested within
IntelliJ 2016.3.2 with no issues.


On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 12:19 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> Java 1.7
> OS: 10.9.5
> Source kit signatures match: y
> Source kit builds: y
> README is ok: y
> RELEASE_NOTES is ok: y
> NOTICE is ok: y
> LICENSE is ok: y
> No unapproved licenses or archives: y
> No unapproved binaries: y
>
> Binary kit signatures match: y
> NOTICE is ok: y
> LICENSE is ok: y
> No unapproved licenses or archives in binary package: y
> No unapproved binaries in binary package: y
>
> ASDoc seems to have content.
>
> Thanks for sticking with it!
> -Alex
>
>
>
> On 3/5/17, 2:18 AM, "Justin Mclean" <justin@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >This is Apache Flex 4.16 release candidate 3. Please see the
> >RELEASE_NOTES and the README.
> >
> >There are minimal changes from the last RC mostly to do with how saxon is
> >downloaded.
> >
> >The release candidate can be found here;
> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.16.0/rc3/
> ><https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flex/sdk/4.16.0/rc>
> >
> >Before voting please review the section,"What are the ASF requirements on
> >approving a release?", at:
> >http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
> ><http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release>
> >
> >At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
> >- MD5 and signed packages are correct
> >- README, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and LICENSE files are all fine
> >- That you can compile from source package
> >- That the SDK can be used in your IDE of choice
> >- That the SDK can be used to make a mobile, desktop and browser
> >application
> >
> >Please vote to approve this release:
> >+1 Approve the release
> >-1 Don’t approve the release (please provide specific comments to why)
> >
> >This vote will be open for 72 hours or until a result can be called.
> >
> >The vote passes if there is:
> >- At least 3 +1 votes from the PMC
> >- More positive votes than negative votes
> >
> >If you find an issue with the release that's a "show stopper" please don't
> >hold off voting -1. If someone votes -1 please continue testing we want to
> >try and catch as many issues as we can and cut down on the number of
> >release candidates. Remember existing voters can change their vote during
> >the voting process.
> >
> >People who are not in PMC are also encouraged to test out the release and
> >vote, although their votes will not be binding, they can influence how the
> >PMC votes.
> >
> >When voting please indicate what OS, IDE, Flash Player version and AIR
> >version you tested the SDK with.
> >
> >Please put all discussion about this release in the DISCUSSION thread not
> >this VOTE thread.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Justin
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message