flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
Subject Re: [FlexJS][Maven] JS-only
Date Sat, 04 Mar 2017 17:39:26 GMT
Hi Alex, 

So I switched to the dual branch and built the compiler without problems. When building the
typedefs however I am getting the exact same error in the JS module.
I guess I will have to adjust the was the typedefs are built. I can see that the AS code is
being generated correctly, but that is no longer compiled to an SWC.

Any ideas? I’ll have a look at the asjs module right away.

Chris

Am 04.03.17, 18:23 schrieb "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com>:

    
    
    On 3/4/17, 1:11 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de> wrote:
    
    >Hi Alex,
    >
    >If you have a flexjs module, that produces just the JavaScript, you need
    >to configure another plugin to pack that up as a war archive as maven
    >doesn’t support directories as build artifacts.
    >So you would need to add that (see the output of the archetype for pure
    >JS applications). In the case of the other native application that
    >shouldn’t produce an SWF, just set
    >“<outputJavaScript>true</outputJavaScript>” … If you like, I could
give
    >you a hand on this … would I need just the dual branch of the asjs or
    >from all modules?
    
    It would be great if you would deal with this.  You will need the dual
    branch from flex-falcon and flex-asjs,  Flex-typedefs doesn't have a dual
    branch.
    
    I think the WAR package is already in the process since if you have a SWF,
    it appears some later step creates the WAR.  I'm assuming that because the
    SWF artifact doesn't exist the build fails before getting to the WAR step.
    
    My hope is that folks can easily switch between generating just SWF
    output, just JS output, or both.  There is a new compiler.targets option
    that drives that, and I've taken out the outputJavaScript option.  Maybe
    that's not the Maven way, but this way folks don't have to configure a
    second execution with the outputJavaScript option on.
    
    Thoughts?
    -Alex
    
    

Mime
View raw message