Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: carlos.rovira@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <D4B79AD7.83E63%aharui@adobe.com>
References: <D41D079E.771CE%aharui@adobe.com> <D466F64F.7BDF2%aharui@adobe.com>
 <3605E4A2-EF58-4412-9EB1-7390D5AA2818@c-ware.de> <D46AD0A2.7BFE8%aharui@adobe.com>
 <260C1798-D2B2-462C-BC1D-318F08A948F0@c-ware.de> <D49E48E7.81B27%aharui@adobe.com>
 <D4B604A8.83C31%aharui@adobe.com> <CAMFKFRggDrk1ESaHbSogh2ZciuLq9AQZb+uTEsoJUfjw=PisXg@mail.gmail.com>
 <307B4D61-9436-4F7A-BEF1-737864AF244E@c-ware.de> <CAMFKFRifts5Pc8=iqFe7brKdku7OXQLqx5K5duh4wnpVK5x8KQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <1485951452348-58914.post@n4.nabble.com> <D4B74904.83DD6%aharui@adobe.com>
 <937DF291-30BB-4AC3-B411-253242E96BB5@gmail.com> <D4B79AD7.83E63%aharui@adobe.com>
From: Carlos Rovira <carlos.rovira@codeoscopic.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 09:57:05 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMFKFRiU-UE8GPyzXC+Mckbwo5g=hC6LHMXahiydbpub_Da13A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [FALCONJX] Combining SWF and JS compilers (was Re: AW:
 [FalconJX][FlexJS] COMPJSC and Build order)
To: "dev@flex.apache.org" <dev@flex.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403045f8fa8af4a720547885ae0
archived-at: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 08:57:40 -0000

--f403045f8fa8af4a720547885ae0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Alex,

to figure about time schedules, it seems you have this already working on
your machine and need some latest touches and refienments right?
So in case I'll separate basic clases and tags, I think it would be better
to do after your change right?
Other way could be to introduce the tags in "Core" SWC and then try to
refactor MDL and remove HTML dependency and see if some class from HTML is
needed and if can be refactor to not need that dependency or we need to
move something from HTML to Core.


2017-02-01 23:05 GMT+01:00 Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com>:

>
>
> On 2/1/17, 1:41 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >One question: How do you envision swc for third party libraries if both
> >JS and SWF swcs are being used?
> >
> >Is this strictly an SDK thing or would there be some mechanism for havin=
g
> >split swcs for libs as well?
>
> I think third-parties will also have to distribute two SWCs if there are
> differences in the API surfaces.  If you have a high-level library that
> just talks to downstream libraries and has no COMPILE:: blocks you
> probably only need the one SWC.
>
> Is this an ok thing to do to our customers?
>
> -Alex
>
>


--=20

Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
informaci=C3=B3n privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje p=
or
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma v=C3=
=ADa y
proceda a su destrucci=C3=B3n.

De la vigente Ley Org=C3=A1nica de Protecci=C3=B3n de Datos (15/1999), le c=
omunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestaci=C3=B3n del
servicio o informaci=C3=B3n solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificaci=C3=B3n, cancelaci=C3=B3n y oposici=C3=B3n de sus datos dirigi=
=C3=A9ndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentaci=C3=B3=
n
necesaria.

--f403045f8fa8af4a720547885ae0--