flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: source forge downloads failing
Date Wed, 08 Feb 2017 04:52:17 GMT

On 2/7/17, 8:35 PM, "Justin Mclean" <justin@classsoftware.com> wrote:

>> Yes, by changing the script.  Any objections to checking in the files
>> currently downloaded to saxon9-NOTICES into the flex-sdk repo?
>Not sure we can, those file are under MPL license right? which is
>category B? [1]

The files in saxon9-notices all appear to be NOTICE-type files.  Not
software.  We bundle those files in the convenience binary anyway so if we
aren't already in violation of [1], we wouldn't be by committing them to
our repo and grabbing them from there.  We would exclude them from the
source package.

Or you could say that it is "small amounts of source" and "that source is
unmodified and unlikely to be changed" as it says in [1].  Or do you see
something else?


>1. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved#category-b

View raw message