flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [FLEXJS] New Default Component Set (was Re: [FlexJS, MDL] Why binding is not working in MDL example)
Date Tue, 03 Jan 2017 20:07:20 GMT
I like Express too!

- Josh

On Jan 3, 2017 10:31 AM, "Peter Ent" <pent@adobe.com> wrote:

> I think "Express" isn't a bad name for this. It implies that you can get
> something running quickly.
>
> Another name I thought of was "Star" (FlexJS Star).
>
> A third choice might be "Prime", meaning the main one to use.
>
> ‹peter
>
> On 1/3/17, 12:14 PM, "Dev LFM" <developerlfm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I've been listening this thread, sorry my intrusion..
> >
> >Why not simply:
> >
> >- ComponentBase for the current set without beads, and "Component" for the
> >ones with default beads included?
> >
> >I like "Express" too but not making much sense to me.
> >
> >My 2 cents ^^
> >
> >2017-01-03 16:53 GMT+00:00 Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com>:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The original thread is another example of where PAYG becomes PITA.  On
> >> another thread, Om wants to bake in HTML sanitization by default.  IMO,
> >> these are things that should go in a heavier component set with more
> >> things baked in.  IMO, this new, heavier component set would be the
> >> default for FlexJS.  No more forgetting to add DataBinding beads, or
> >> SimpleCSSValuesImpl, etc.  Fewer tags to write.
> >>
> >> I've asked Peter to start on it so you can see how to bake stuff in and
> >> how much simpler it will make our examples.  I think it will help in
> >> getting folks started with fewer problems.  I think we've proven that we
> >> can composite basic things into more complex things.
> >>
> >> But, we need a good name for this set.  I don't like "Heavy".  Makes me
> >> think it would be too fat and slow.  I've ruled out for now "Kitchen
> >> Sink", and "Full" (because it won't contain every bead).  I've thought
> >> about "Medium", "Typical", "Common", "Popular", "POC" (Proof of
> >>Concept)",
> >> "RP" (Rapid Prototyping).  Don't like any of them.  What name would
> >> suggest that it is not on the place to start but that you could use it
> >>in
> >> production if you don't run into size/performance issues?
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 1/2/17, 11:20 PM, "piotrz" <piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Alex,
> >> >
> >> >That's what I'm missing. It's a bit better cause when I add bead
> >> >"ItemRendererDataBinding" my getter has been fired, although binding is
> >> >still not working. I've just pushed my code. - Not sure what can be
> >> >wrong.
> >> >
> >> >I have to admit I'm still thinking to much Flex instead of FlexJS :)
> >> >
> >> >Piotr
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >-----
> >> >Apache Flex PMC
> >> >piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com
> >> >--
> >> >View this message in context:
> >> >http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.
> >> com/FlexJS-MDL-Why-bindin
> >> >g-is-not-working-in-MDL-example-tp57738p57795.html
> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
> >>Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message