Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34AB2200BD8 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 19:39:49 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 3344A160B0C; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 18:39:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B9F1160AF9 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 19:39:48 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 8795 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2016 18:39:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 8781 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2016 18:39:47 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 18:39:47 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id BB920C8A53 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 18:39:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.73 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.73 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=2, KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ=0.75, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ym3Mn0EDrkYa for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 18:39:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com (mail-wm0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 363D05F2EF for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 18:39:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id g23so181969085wme.1 for ; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 10:39:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=TwuqK0yMDys5emgfQViGuCdH0nm2qNmbLtNh/5U3gMI=; b=05lyDUbntYqP3VD4yMrMC381elJQjz2TcWCSkZmYr/saeRW+SN23PKqNx2qj8uXwmA JUiYRxsH+/J8autIGMdEZstzaO9lFpXa3VtQLPLPq4eL13dlst2DaI3GXazihFZ9Z45k Kn1Wb8iAhbVKIFJPsBua6Kd/aQXFBXnx2v/ClD54qYbrz1goZs5vm+Z5aGndKw+8pRjM 8loCWXAAvhfi/hU1Pb/Xb6LAaWK5PsBQfMWdV9DD2paZw3meCS6HzShJtQxtOqC/IGRP ebSBQ7nwJJ3+bdYthNT0fnTq8WpmJP5paY2QDSfPjX9e58ggg4g5cE+y3u+flCqUwjK1 IURg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=TwuqK0yMDys5emgfQViGuCdH0nm2qNmbLtNh/5U3gMI=; b=lbbOijyYiF1SMMaV3IGo+f5CoMLnvmYq5WwbV/i2S0UEvrbyy0p6oYCuf/YDYA8G1C WlLqBiVN/F/L3FdQu5lIMz4U3nmqDUxParTuhksYQYYynby5HRWcQfZRnZMg9i+Rvc8X SJqiAzIFx1qvC1A13n77GJbSdf10Ivgbou6DRVi0njJd6I9xSqJ/BIoAiPraW/gvU/ze K4Ga53fxx8WxLDtYQB2gGxmzFkPiBFs6Avuhvm8P2lxCEmK7lRSOyB5tVpr6zHexTWli mqSiHbWJIHu7lQ6KU+g3crRQOwydFSiOr69EJkg/PPLa3n9ROxD2aew43t8DySs71hKW ROig== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03paexqsoe+yzsilhFJYPUrDAc5zPqJN32PteqWmcMFPQUvNaGGdsvk6l4u+VelHymAsW0z9uc8dg8kbw== X-Received: by 10.28.211.72 with SMTP id k69mr3787234wmg.137.1481135981280; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 10:39:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: carlos.rovira@gmail.com Received: by 10.28.145.19 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Dec 2016 10:39:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Carlos Rovira Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 19:39:20 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: pdTE9gMgs6wBy14x_6s5tvui4IQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: [FlexJS] About Flash output To: "dev@flex.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11470106074dee054315d87b archived-at: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 18:39:49 -0000 --001a11470106074dee054315d87b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Alex IMO, the problem with Flex mobile performance isn't > the display list, it is the rest of the code that has to run before the > display list gets updated. Most mobile apps I've seen don't need 3D > rendering. Everything is flat 2D UI. The FlexJS SWF code is much lighter > weight than Flex Spark. No need to solve a problem that doesn't exist, > IMO. > That's great. I can't talk about actual FlexJS swf performance in mobile since I didn't try it (hope I could get a try soon), but your comment sound good and hope it meets expectations. -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira --001a11470106074dee054315d87b--