Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCEFA200BA6 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 17:19:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id BB732160ADC; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:19:35 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E681160ACC for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 17:19:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 99189 invoked by uid 500); 18 Oct 2016 15:19:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 99177 invoked by uid 99); 18 Oct 2016 15:19:33 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:19:33 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 362E91804F7 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:19:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.379 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.379 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id azdroMOJcayw for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lf0-f66.google.com (mail-lf0-f66.google.com [209.85.215.66]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id E81C35F47D for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:19:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f66.google.com with SMTP id b75so32945287lfg.3 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 08:19:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=782fWBCYrO3iVANozz7MUqzO8XEDcsg1c0+4MroeVIk=; b=fNWm48XHA8XikrU7SgYka2YTn7nvOB6bRJW0oDbA5hbW5L4gH1mH+0zbmZb8PF4ogU yO6w+/cMdsik9giI5yqqiJUdt4U7LAKXsUgZPmELETVAwCvYqBacHdta1NNXBN8T+Kux eF2BK8xcae2rka+nRXFYJiLI27s/3AwiOBSVsMh0x/dFbGTF43ZREl5wiUPND765WqZV WhKNSai69DTpbh0gEp27DzJ+N+Ry/mD7NjpOkwmOHvqnS/9aVudbnm+C6403pkssMFxu QU086MIocNWf1ItfVi9lhbDG1znPD7mV1j9nkdNrV8tSwdX7ezDjQTuAC6Vqwhu5V6xH hk2w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=782fWBCYrO3iVANozz7MUqzO8XEDcsg1c0+4MroeVIk=; b=NIO7UDked6gJZe3qLhHXu9uemRgKJSVL33wZVOOexBnJghvyTlzQRveQ7+xBneL1Xi JuJsjYofqjkLc8t7Kn6m+htDPXP8SKtMUtQ1ATrmaZTJFOjC7/trm+FB8G0bSZNb6YZt y6K953ldR3sXNvA3/1GC5Xsdzg9RpDc6Yi1UCX27g/prXi9LBpXItx68ZFIvwxQ1ldG8 njEO76Wx22+v0lIRBotiIebMLjV7bv3kBSWeczKDkQbCoexnu9sWw9zO6q+7pdnfXaP/ gCv4FRW/xj4cbG8YG6rq+W2s9EGfZ6dAMqnjen2SKZD1oZZeggdpm26ufjijNDpkbLoE Os0w== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rklbpp9BtcWDCtczhtm8HtwEPqTlN807t8w7XByIUtssSxmR60pI3pDOgn9TzwTew== X-Received: by 10.194.55.65 with SMTP id q1mr563582wjp.45.1476803969980; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 08:19:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([185.120.124.24]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ux6sm52021050wjb.18.2016.10.18.08.19.28 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 18 Oct 2016 08:19:29 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: [FlexJS] enabled property From: Harbs In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 18:19:29 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9706EAB7-7388-4B5A-B871-D63C4DD881D5@gmail.com> References: <1F77D007-925A-4606-A380-0C8D972378AF@gmail.com> To: dev@flex.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) archived-at: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:19:35 -0000 I responded about 3 weeks ago, but I don=92t know where the response = went. I just resent it=85 On Oct 18, 2016, at 6:11 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > On 10/18/16, 5:06 AM, "Harbs" wrote: >=20 >> The purpose is to remove all Flash APIs from Flex objects. The = refactor >> composes Flash objects rather than inherits them. >>=20 >> I would like to merge it into develop now, but Alex has questioned >> whether we want to keep the refactor. It=92s basically waiting for = someone >> to do some profiling to see whether Alex=92s concerns are an issue. >=20 > Actually, I proposed a workflow that I think eliminates the need for = the > sprite-refactor. Please find the "HTMLElementWrapper extending = Sprite" > thread and add your thoughts. I'm pretty sure this is a tool-chain = issue > and the runtime code should not pay the price. >=20 >=20 >>=20 >> I really hope we can just merge it in because we=92ve done a LOT of = work on >> it=85 >=20 > I also proposed how we would revert the wrapping and then merge all of = the > other changes. It won't be trivial, but it should preserve all the = good > parts. >=20 > Thanks, > -Alex >=20