Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org
From: Christofer Dutz <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>
To: "dev@flex.apache.org" <dev@flex.apache.org>
Subject: AW: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1
Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1
Thread-Index: AQHSB4NAgaX5QojRHUSKwIh9uAhNqqBrkhOAgAB8b4CAAAPj6w==
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 07:33:13 +0000
Message-ID: <HE1PR0501MB24287D58A8944B5AAA683378A2F90@HE1PR0501MB2428.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <D3F2CABB.7474D%aharui@adobe.com>
 <D3F3B50B.7483A%aharui@adobe.com>,<25B7D233-26E9-432F-B7FD-785D8B1BE25C@classsoftware.com>
In-Reply-To: <25B7D233-26E9-432F-B7FD-785D8B1BE25C@classsoftware.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: c-ware.de does not designate
 permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="_000_HE1PR0501MB24287D58A8944B5AAA683378A2F90HE1PR0501MB2428_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Sep 2016 07:33:13.1681
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 9d387546-1437-4b89-846c-691d64a7e74d
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1PR0501MB2428
archived-at: Tue, 06 Sep 2016 07:33:27 -0000

--_000_HE1PR0501MB24287D58A8944B5AAA683378A2F90HE1PR0501MB2428_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

To add my 5ct to the discussion.


I don't quite understand, why we have to remove the old header anyway ... s=
houldn't it be possible to add the Apache header (would sort of be both in =
there) ... the Patch file itself should have an Apache Header, I think. But=
 the resulting file shouldn't have the old header removed.


Chris

________________________________
Von: Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. September 2016 09:17:47
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex FalconJX 0.7.0 RC1

Hi,

> I looked over the artifacts and noticed that the flexjs-maven-plugin
> sources are not in the source package.  However, it appears the
> flexjs-maven-plugin sources are in the source.jar for flexjs-maven-plugin=
,
> so I think we can just consider that source.jar as one of the artefacts.

You might want to add the links to the missing source code in the vote thre=
ad, I=92m not sure we could release these extra bits without those sources =
have been looked by the PMC and voted on if they are missing from the curre=
nt source release.

> BTW, I am thinking that if we have a majority vote by my Wednesday

When you have time would you mind responding with your thoughts to the outs=
tanding patch file issue (3rd party headers being removed), that seems reas=
onably serious to me.

Thanks,
Justin

--_000_HE1PR0501MB24287D58A8944B5AAA683378A2F90HE1PR0501MB2428_--