Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <681DABD9-E658-428A-9F36-F0FC12F14968@gmail.com>
References: <1473233159309-54897.post@n4.nabble.com> <1473233920260-54898.post@n4.nabble.com>
 <CCDE5E1A3636E94DAFC84D259AC75FA460D18DB6@MCUSPTGZXI02V.mcdsus.mcds.usmc.mil>
 <1473245778794-54911.post@n4.nabble.com> <D3F591F2.74ADE%aharui@adobe.com>
 <1473285499100-54938.post@n4.nabble.com> <HE1PR0501MB2428A65F4160DD525248A990A2F80@HE1PR0501MB2428.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
 <A6E53351-B0B1-4E3C-ACDF-93260D7ADBC0@gmail.com> <HE1PR0501MB2428F40C800A33751E3B4C5CA2FB0@HE1PR0501MB2428.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
 <681DABD9-E658-428A-9F36-F0FC12F14968@gmail.com>
From: Josh Tynjala <joshtynjala@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 07:40:39 -0700
Message-ID: <CADZSWG7082faYDLMip1KDtByw7VQvX_g2dLMW=usQbfCR4zjRg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Official naming for the "standard" Flex SDK
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1148c104812b81053c000373
archived-at: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 14:40:46 -0000

--001a1148c104812b81053c000373
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

You have my agreement too!

- Josh

On Sep 8, 2016 4:15 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.lists@gmail.com> wrote:

> Well, if no one has objections, we can officially agree on it now=E2=80=
=A6 ;-)
>
> On Sep 8, 2016, at 11:15 AM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Harbs,
> >
> >
> > well that's what I'm using when talking about FlexJS, but I couldn't
> remember us actually agreeing on that ;-)
> >
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > ________________________________
> > Von: Harbs <harbs.lists@gmail.com>
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. September 2016 09:33:44
> > An: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Official naming for the "standard" Flex S=
DK
> >
> > I think falcon and falconjx can be blurred.
> >
> > I thought we agreed on "FlexJS Compiler" (falcon/falconjx), "FlexJS
> Typedefs=E2=80=9D (typedefs) and "FlexJS Framework" (asjs)
> >
> > On Sep 8, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I see it the same way ... Flex and FlexJS is good for me. The only
> thing I was having problems with, was the naming of the inside parts of
> FlexJS: falcon, falconjx, asjs, typedefs ... here I would like some sort =
of
> consolidation, but not really for Flex/FlexJS.
> >>
> >>
> >> Chris
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> Von: OK <post@olafkrueger.net>
> >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. September 2016 23:58:19
> >> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> >> Betreff: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Official naming for the "standard"
> Flex SDK
> >>
> >> Thanks for your thoughts Marc and Alex.
> >>
> >>> I am hopeful that the "JS" in FlexJS will be enough of a
> differentiator.
> >> FlexJS is definately clear and unambiguously.
> >>
> >> Maybe I was on the wrong track and Apache Flex/Apache FlexJS is
> sufficient.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Olaf
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context: http://apache-flex-
> development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/Official-naming-for-the-
> standard-Flex-SDK-tp54897p54938.html
> >> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> >
>
>

--001a1148c104812b81053c000373--