flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
Subject AW: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 RC1
Date Wed, 07 Sep 2016 06:15:38 GMT
Hi gu
Hire about this option: we ship the release and address this issue with asf legal to settle
this discussion once and for all.

I understand Justin's point. On the other side I understand you guys, that want to get stuff
out the door. I don't understand your continued objections to Justin's findings however. If
I didn't understand it wrong, he is suggesting to add a mention of the license and to keep
the headers in tact. What harm would there be done by this? So let's just do it in "develop",
but release 0.7.0 now.

Justin you are right, I could do my talk without, but being able to say "released yesterday"
or "today" would be valuable help in getting people to look at it.


Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.

-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: Harbs <harbs.lists@gmail.com>
Datum: 07.09.16 07:21 (GMT+01:00)
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.7.0 RC1


I’m not even convinced we need the mention of the MIT license for OpenFL (there was no verbatim
code copied). Even if we do mention it, including the full license text is not a release blocker
and can be treated as a bug for the next release.

On Sep 7, 2016, at 2:21 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:

>> I’ll let Chris speak for himself but I’m sure he can use a snapshot /
>> nightly release for this talk so I don’t think  here’s no real need for
>> expediency here.
> Sure, there are alternatives.  But IMO the community is best served by
> delivering a release for his talk.  We have given every opportunity for
> folks to help make this happen.  We can still make it happen.  You have
> your opinion.  We'll see what the other PMC members want to do.  I
> encourage them to vote +1.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message