flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
Subject AW: [Non-DoD Source] Official naming for the "standard" Flex SDK
Date Thu, 08 Sep 2016 15:10:40 GMT
+1 :-) from me :-)


Chris

________________________________
Von: Josh Tynjala <joshtynjala@gmail.com>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. September 2016 16:40:39
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Official naming for the "standard" Flex SDK

You have my agreement too!

- Josh

On Sep 8, 2016 4:15 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.lists@gmail.com> wrote:

> Well, if no one has objections, we can officially agree on it now… ;-)
>
> On Sep 8, 2016, at 11:15 AM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Harbs,
> >
> >
> > well that's what I'm using when talking about FlexJS, but I couldn't
> remember us actually agreeing on that ;-)
> >
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > ________________________________
> > Von: Harbs <harbs.lists@gmail.com>
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. September 2016 09:33:44
> > An: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Official naming for the "standard" Flex SDK
> >
> > I think falcon and falconjx can be blurred.
> >
> > I thought we agreed on "FlexJS Compiler" (falcon/falconjx), "FlexJS
> Typedefs” (typedefs) and "FlexJS Framework" (asjs)
> >
> > On Sep 8, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I see it the same way ... Flex and FlexJS is good for me. The only
> thing I was having problems with, was the naming of the inside parts of
> FlexJS: falcon, falconjx, asjs, typedefs ... here I would like some sort of
> consolidation, but not really for Flex/FlexJS.
> >>
> >>
> >> Chris
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> Von: OK <post@olafkrueger.net>
> >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. September 2016 23:58:19
> >> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> >> Betreff: Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Official naming for the "standard"
> Flex SDK
> >>
> >> Thanks for your thoughts Marc and Alex.
> >>
> >>> I am hopeful that the "JS" in FlexJS will be enough of a
> differentiator.
> >> FlexJS is definately clear and unambiguously.
> >>
> >> Maybe I was on the wrong track and Apache Flex/Apache FlexJS is
> sufficient.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Olaf
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> View this message in context: http://apache-flex-
> development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/Official-naming-for-the-
> standard-Flex-SDK-tp54897p54938.html
> >> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message