flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Dove <greg.d...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: AW: AW: [FlexJS] Problem with some test cases (@export was changed to @expose)?
Date Wed, 28 Sep 2016 18:44:15 GMT
I will look at this now.

I had intended for relection to always be at the end, so that definitely
sounds wrong.
I did find the usedNames/postProcess sequence to be a possible candidate
for refactor at some point, but was not keen to mess with this at the
moment. I think I found that some usedNames were not being added to
goog.requires as it was originally.

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 7:33 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:

> Looked into it.  It appears to be related to Greg's changes in
> 0bde1ec7a47341294280082331ce8b2c023d756f
> In MXMLFlexJSEmitter, the namesToAdd is including internal classes which
> it shouldn't.  Probably the subDocuments list can be used to further
> filter what gets added to namesToAdd.
> Also, the reflection data for internal classes is being emitted at the top
> of the output file.  That should probably get changed as well.
> I'm going back to other things.  I expect Greg will take care of this.
> Greg, let us know if you need help or don't have time.
> -Alex
> On 9/28/16, 9:40 AM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:
> >The Ant build doesn't build the examples.  Maybe it should.  The
> >ChartExample fails for me from Ant as well.  I will look into it.
> >
> >-Alex
> >
> >On 9/28/16, 2:30 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de> wrote:
> >
> >>Ok now the modules that were failing compile successfully. Unfortunately
> >>now a little more down the stream the examples seem to be failing. I am
> >>getting errors in the chart example (just the first example to be
> >>compiled) It seems the JS compilation is failing because it cant find
> >>generated classes.
> >>
> >>
> >>https://builds.apache.org/view/E-G/view/Flex/job/FlexJS%
> 20Framework%20(ma
> >>v
> >>en)/269/console
> >>
> >>
> >>Did anything change in this part recently?
> >

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message