flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carlos Rovira <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com>
Subject Re: [Falcon] Quick sanity check - I am getting timeouts on compiler-jx tests
Date Thu, 21 Jul 2016 21:24:34 GMT
Really cool Chris, I already did not follow yet, but I'll do soon.

I could suggest to make another page as a follow up with simple steps for
people creating a project from scratch with mavenized FlexJS , since create
a basic pom, and so on...
I think better if it was IDE oriented (and I'll suggest IntelliJ)

Thanks!

Carlos



2016-07-21 22:51 GMT+02:00 Greg Dove <greg.dove@gmail.com>:

> The how-to seems real easy :) I will give it a try later today!
>
> And my original issue with the timeouts somehow fixed itself today, those
> tests complete in under a minute now! I forgot the golden rule of Windows:
> If something doesn't work right, try a reboot.
>
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Christofer Dutz <
> christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>
> wrote:
>
> > Ok ... just finished the how-to:
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Building+FlexJS+with+Maven
> >
> > I'd appreciate feedback ;-)
> >
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > ________________________________
> > Von: Greg Dove <greg.dove@gmail.com>
> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Juli 2016 08:56:53
> > An: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: [Falcon] Quick sanity check - I am getting timeouts on
> > compiler-jx tests
> >
> > The forkMode is perBatch not perTest so that 'sounds like' (I am unsure!)
> > that shouldn't have such a big impact.
> > I had thought this was definitely much faster previously so I think
> > something might have changed on my side. I do see an additional Java
> > process being started, but it sits at 0% cpu, so not really sure what is
> > going on. But I'm not too worried for now as I don't run these often
> > (although I am messing a bit with the compiler code to see what I can get
> > my head around).
> >
> > I am open to trying Maven, will be happy to check out the how-to when
> it's
> > ready. I have never used Maven before... only ant.
> >
> > cheers,
> > Greg
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Christofer Dutz <
> > christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > without fork the build doesn't have to create a new vm for every test.
> > > This is a huge performance improvement. You could also give the Maven
> > build
> > > a try ... This seems to be a lot faster :-)
> > >
> > > I'm currently working on a how-to doc on that.
> > >
> > > Chris
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Von meinem Samsung Galaxy Smartphone gesendet.
> > >
> > >
> > > -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
> > > Von: Greg Dove <greg.dove@gmail.com>
> > > Datum: 21.07.16 05:54 (GMT+01:00)
> > > An: dev@flex.apache.org
> > > Betreff: Re: [Falcon] Quick sanity check - I am getting timeouts on
> > > compiler-jx tests
> > >
> > > Thanks Alex.
> > >
> > > It actually runs about 25% faster when I set fork="no" on the junit
> task
> > > which seems odd to me.
> > > This is on windows 10. The whole 'ant all' build from flex-asjs used to
> > > take around 8-9 mins, and now takes 17 mins.
> > > I must have inadvertently changed something in my setup somewhere to
> > cause
> > > this, perhaps it is related to ant version or something like that.
> > > I'll come back to it later, for now at least I can get it to complete.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > They run in a few minutes on my Mac.  I've found that on occasion
> > memory
> > > > gets low or maybe some other variable changes and the tests slow way
> > down
> > > > because a new VM is launched for every test and that seems to take a
> > long
> > > > time.
> > > >
> > > > HTH,
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > > On 7/20/16, 1:26 PM, "Greg Dove" <greg.dove@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >Can someone please let me know how long the compiler.jx.tests
> normally
> > > > >take
> > > > >to run. I am getting timeouts, this is probably related to the speed
> > of
> > > my
> > > > >dev machine I'm guessing. If I bump test.timeout to 600000 (10 mins)
> > > they
> > > > >complete in around 8 mins.
> > > > >
> > > > >This happens to me on develop branch builds. I suspect it's just my
> > > > >machine, but wanted to make sure it's not some recent change in the
> > > code,
> > > > >because I *thought* these used to be much faster.
> > > > >
> > > > >thanks
> > > > >-Greg
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>



-- 

Carlos Rovira
Director General
M: +34 607 22 60 05
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.avant2.es


Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener
información privilegiada o confidencial. Si ha recibido este mensaje por
error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y
proceda a su destrucción.

De la vigente Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (15/1999), le comunicamos
que sus datos forman parte de un fichero cuyo responsable es CODEOSCOPIC
S.A. La finalidad de dicho tratamiento es facilitar la prestación del
servicio o información solicitados, teniendo usted derecho de acceso,
rectificación, cancelación y oposición de sus datos dirigiéndose a nuestras
oficinas c/ Paseo de la Habana 9-11, 28036, Madrid con la documentación
necesaria.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message