flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Changed svg namespace
Date Tue, 26 Jul 2016 19:52:42 GMT
Internally, it’s always setting it to 0,0. It looks to me like some renderers might be doing
some relative positioning, but I did not study them well enough to figure it out.

I think it was in charts, so Peter should probably have a better idea.

On Jul 26, 2016, at 10:41 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 7/26/16, 11:47 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I agree there should be a Group object.
>> 
>> The problem is that the way the classes are currently constructed is that
>> 100 pixel “Rect" positioned at 100,100 actually contains the following
>> markup: <svg x=“100” y=“100"><rect x=“0” y=“0” width=“100”
>> height=“100”/></svg>
> 
> Are you saying that code is doing relative positioning re-calculation?  I
> would wonder why it does that.  Otherwise, a more straightforward mapping
> would make sense.
> 
> -Alex
> 


Mime
View raw message