flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Starling framework compiled to JavaScript
Date Tue, 05 Apr 2016 22:29:06 GMT
Hey Mike,

In my work on source maps, I've overridden a number of methods from
ASEmitter that aren't currently in sub-emitters for JS. Should I go ahead
and make new sub-emitters for those things?

- Josh

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Michael Schmalle <teotigraphixllc@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:36 PM, bill <bill@beecavegames.com> wrote:
>
> > Here's our fork of the flex-falcon repo:
> >
> > https://github.com/Bee-Cave-Games/flex-falcon
> >
> > The last handful of commits reflect the changes Nimai mentioned above.
> > We're
> > still learning our way around the code, so some of these things could
> > likely
> > be done in a simpler / better way.
> >
> >
> >
> Looks good to me!
>
> Everything can be simpler, last year I went through the main javascript
> emitter and broke every thing out into sub emitters, MethodEmitter etc.
>
> I did that because it was starting to turn into a rats nest, I think there
> is to much inheritance right now but that is more design. So I created
> composites so you could easily do what you are doing right now, work in the
> Class/Method emitters and feel pretty safe you are only changing that code.
>
> I can say with a pretty good certainty that is the way most of those
> emitters behave right now. There are a few places where there is still un
> needed coupling and I think I still have those as TODOs.
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/Starling-framework-compiled-to-JavaScript-tp52188p52192.html
> > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message