flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Discuss]Accept donation of drawing APIs
Date Tue, 19 Apr 2016 01:47:33 GMT
I vote for keeping the package names same, i.e. flash.*.*  The proposed
package name swapping seems to confusing.  And could be error-prone.

We already have package names like jquery.*.* and createjs.*.* where we are
using the same package names for consistency.  Are we proposing to change
all those package names as well, so that we dont set expectations of doing
everything that jquery does?

If it turns out that that lot of folks complain about the classes not
meeting the expectations, we could probably add the features or worst case
swap the package names to flex.*


On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 6:10 PM, lizhi <sliz@qq.com> wrote:

> no need some fork.no need extends,it just the final.
> now the code and get a.swf and a.js from one code.
> and can get starling.js.
> if chang the package name.
> we can not get a.swf,and starling.js
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/Discuss-Accept-donation-of-drawing-APIs-tp52429p52486.html
> Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message