Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D31DFD8F.66222%aharui@adobe.com>
References: 
 <DB5PR05MB1285D2D1BDFD327ADFCD86B3A2850@DB5PR05MB1285.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
	<D31D3C5F.661D4%aharui@adobe.com>
	<001601d18846$25e6b560$71b42020$@tinylion.co.uk>
	<D31DFD8F.66222%aharui@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 12:40:17 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAJs+wW2ewCL8=+nGAF1t4AQ7RVb+1a7aj1YaOdG0HiK_zAaLuA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] How about bringing Falcon and ASJS together?
From: Erik de Bruin <erik@ixsoftware.nl>
To: "dev@flex.apache.org" <dev@flex.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013d1ebae60fcf052f1989eb

--089e013d1ebae60fcf052f1989eb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

At one point I had the entire SDK cross-compiling to Javascript. Look at
VF2JS, I think it is still in the repo.

It didn't run, but it was up to the point where "all" that was needed was a
lot of bootstrapping ;-)

EdB


On Monday, 28 March 2016, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:

> AFAIK, nobody has spent any time on it, but soon, I am going to find out
> if Falcon can compile UIComponent correctly or not (and whether FalconJX
> can cross-compile it).
>
> -Alex
>
> On 3/27/16, 9:31 AM, "Glenn Williams" <info@tinylion.co.uk <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> >Hi all
> >
> >As a sub-question:
> >
> >What's the current state of Falcon for compiling Flex SDK apps?
> >
> >I've not been able to keep up to date here as much as I'd like to. The
> >last time I looked Falcon was not anywhere near complete enough to be
> >used. Is this still the case?
> >
> >Thanks folks
> >
> >Glenn
> >tinylion
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Alex Harui [mailto:aharui@adobe.com <javascript:;>]
> >Sent: 27 March 2016 15:31
> >To: dev@flex.apache.org <javascript:;>
> >Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] How about bringing Falcon and ASJS together?
> >
> >We've had this discussion before.  Falcon was also intended to be the
> >next-generation compiler for the regular Flex SDK, and FalconJX is being
> >considered for other non-Apache frameworks like Feathers.
> >
> >Is it really true that no Maven projects have validation suites against
> >downstream projects?  Maybe the integration tests need to be in a
> >different repo or something?
> >
> >-Alex
> >
> >On 3/27/16, 2:38 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >>I don't know if we had this discussion recently, but I would like to
> >>propose to bring together the two sub-projects Falcon and ASJS. The
> >>reason for this is that they are naturally tightly connected, which
> >>becomes obvious every time a release is coming and internally a lot of
> >>tests depend on ASJS and ASJS needs Falcon to be built. This
> >>entanglement makes it hard do releases Maven-style. Bringing both
> >>together should make a lot of things easier.
> >>
> >>
> >>If the problem is adjusting the build for the merged project, I could
> >>disable the cross-cutting tests (as I already have) and do the same
> >>Maven conversion for ASJS. As soon as that's done it should be easy to
> >>merge both parts.
> >>
> >>
> >>And I would propose to name the project "FlexJS".
> >>
> >>
> >>What do you think?
> >>
> >>
> >>Chris
> >
> >
>
>

-- 
Ix Multimedia Software

Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht

T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl

--089e013d1ebae60fcf052f1989eb--