Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: omuppi1@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <D2B52E50.60032%aharui@adobe.com>
References: <D2B52E50.60032%aharui@adobe.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 09:36:32 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CACK5iZdhgmQ+rQXAGZ9q62t58H+zxKmFF=MP77z-ZDTGJi9ygQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: AW: [ApacheCon NA] Whose going and what topics?
From: OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com>
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1143a00a39bd320528d60754

--001a1143a00a39bd320528d60754
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Jan 8, 2016 9:17 AM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> I've been wondering if there should be a "Client" track as an umbrella for
> both Flex and Cordova talks.  Especially since FlexJS Mobile is output via
> Cordova.  If folks think that's a good idea I will hit up the Cordova
> folks I know to see what they think.

+1 for a Client track.
Although we will be doing not just FlexJS, but also Flex web and  Flex
Mobile (which is kinda like a competitor to Cordova)

Apache Wicket might be a good target as well.

Thanks,
Om

>
> -Alex
>
> On 1/8/16, 1:56 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de> wrote:
>
> >A track makes it easier to get at least enough talks for the track
> >selected. Without a track it has to sort of fit into another track.
> >Depending on how they cut the tracks this could be difficult. We we want
> >to go for a track, I could re-submit updated versions of my last
> >submissions regarding BlazeDS and FlexJS support in Maven.
> >
> >But my stomach sort of tells me that it could be difficult to get a track
> >as the attendee numbers weren't great last time. That's why I was
> >intending on submitting something Flexy under the hood of a different
> >track (After all ... the (mobile) frontend and backend (BlazeDS) will be
> >Apache Flex) ;-)
> >
> >If we want a track, I could try to take care of this ... but only if
> >there is interest in this ... I remember feeling left a little alone with
> >the content at first for ApacheCon EU last time (Thanks to Justin and Om
> >it wasn't a big problem though :-) )
> >
> >Chris
> >
> >________________________________________
> >Von: omuppi1@gmail.com <omuppi1@gmail.com> im Auftrag von OmPrakash
> >Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com>
> >Gesendet: Freitag, 8. Januar 2016 00:57
> >An: dev@flex.apache.org
> >Betreff: Re: [ApacheCon NA] Whose going and what topics?
> >
> >On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 1/7/16, 3:46 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash
Muppirala"
> >> <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >I would like to propose something on FlexJS or Flex Mobile, depending
> >>on
> >> >what others are doing.
> >> >
> >> >Should we ask for a Flex track here as well?
> >>
> >> Don't we have to have a track to get Flex sessions accepted at all?
> >>
> >
> >Not necessarily.  If we have a track, there is a better chance of Flex
> >talks being accepted.  If we don't, then it is up in the air as to which
> >ones get selected.  At least, that's the impression I got from the
> >ApacheCon EU selection process.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> You seem a bit more interested in the JS.swc usage.  Do you want to do
a
> >> session on that?
> >>
> >
> >Sure, that would be fun.  We need to come up with a cool name for 'JS.swc
> >usage'.  We have been lumping everything under FlexJS, which seems wrong.
> >
> >It would be nice if someone else did a talk on Flex Mobile.  Any takers?
> >You don't have to be a committer or a PMC member to give a talk.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Om
> >
> >
> >>
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >>
>

--001a1143a00a39bd320528d60754--