flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: AW: [ApacheCon NA] Whose going and what topics?
Date Fri, 08 Jan 2016 17:16:55 GMT
I've been wondering if there should be a "Client" track as an umbrella for
both Flex and Cordova talks.  Especially since FlexJS Mobile is output via
Cordova.  If folks think that's a good idea I will hit up the Cordova
folks I know to see what they think.


On 1/8/16, 1:56 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de> wrote:

>A track makes it easier to get at least enough talks for the track
>selected. Without a track it has to sort of fit into another track.
>Depending on how they cut the tracks this could be difficult. We we want
>to go for a track, I could re-submit updated versions of my last
>submissions regarding BlazeDS and FlexJS support in Maven.
>But my stomach sort of tells me that it could be difficult to get a track
>as the attendee numbers weren't great last time. That's why I was
>intending on submitting something Flexy under the hood of a different
>track (After all ... the (mobile) frontend and backend (BlazeDS) will be
>Apache Flex) ;-)
>If we want a track, I could try to take care of this ... but only if
>there is interest in this ... I remember feeling left a little alone with
>the content at first for ApacheCon EU last time (Thanks to Justin and Om
>it wasn't a big problem though :-) )
>Von: omuppi1@gmail.com <omuppi1@gmail.com> im Auftrag von OmPrakash
>Muppirala <bigosmallm@gmail.com>
>Gesendet: Freitag, 8. Januar 2016 00:57
>An: dev@flex.apache.org
>Betreff: Re: [ApacheCon NA] Whose going and what topics?
>On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:
>> On 1/7/16, 3:46 PM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
>> <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >I would like to propose something on FlexJS or Flex Mobile, depending
>> >what others are doing.
>> >
>> >Should we ask for a Flex track here as well?
>> Don't we have to have a track to get Flex sessions accepted at all?
>Not necessarily.  If we have a track, there is a better chance of Flex
>talks being accepted.  If we don't, then it is up in the air as to which
>ones get selected.  At least, that's the impression I got from the
>ApacheCon EU selection process.
>> You seem a bit more interested in the JS.swc usage.  Do you want to do a
>> session on that?
>Sure, that would be fun.  We need to come up with a cool name for 'JS.swc
>usage'.  We have been lumping everything under FlexJS, which seems wrong.
>It would be nice if someone else did a talk on Flex Mobile.  Any takers?
>You don't have to be a committer or a PMC member to give a talk.
>> -Alex

View raw message