Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8242D18E71 for ; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 06:24:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25229 invoked by uid 500); 27 Dec 2015 06:24:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 25185 invoked by uid 500); 27 Dec 2015 06:24:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 25173 invoked by uid 99); 27 Dec 2015 06:24:41 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 06:24:41 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1CD2318027C for ; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 06:24:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.121 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.121 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DQ2zdcYyM0W2 for ; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 06:24:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com (mail-wm0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 7F002203A3 for ; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 06:24:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f43.google.com with SMTP id p187so230171852wmp.0 for ; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 22:24:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=3PXKumZNW11YV4fiTJjrTJxcPel5Z8WYInNHg4CFG8k=; b=SK52fAvjIDYSCIbDSc5EyqhxVaoyxziQHd/63NmUGnpZdEuvmd2RdFbJkaN3kvTS6N MlKrc/BQjRvx0k8We0agUVh+7kChc1JVxh1Gfoo7PTH6QFrVv5t//P8c10nGShdC6xhj GlM8w+3/exVGE2sVWFRdjTrGh09m4ByRl66tMDbzo2Tb2RyyTwyLjLh1z66FdKXiOU+C FnYmWqdJIQbTixFHzOlJulfEJ2KcnNZNUrPJ2tRtkGahsG6Mro+bYMElMltWRe4W4ggt XWj208COjKawmAL/6NQxrQT/uaVaRk6pKg3LEQ2nmnlC7RPuApzP6eW9+xyvVgf0E81i gr/g== X-Received: by 10.28.94.1 with SMTP id s1mr51266354wmb.60.1451197479294; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 22:24:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([185.120.126.24]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l20sm43625963wmd.20.2015.12.26.22.24.38 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 26 Dec 2015 22:24:38 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: [TLF Unit Tests] From: Harbs In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 08:24:36 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <07E6A980-7318-4A95-8875-2567C71D7849@gmail.com> References: <6FB111D1-7DBF-4089-A7D6-9B3DB5822E72@gmail.com> To: dev@flex.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) I would think there wouldn=92t be a difference. I don=92t know if the = fonts are embedded. Do the tests pass for you on Mac? Maybe it=92s a = retina-specific difference? (I=92m running the tests on a 15 in MacBook = Pro Retina.) The odd thing is that I=92m pretty sure that I did not used to get these = failures. Were they disabled and then at some point and then enabled? I=92m personally not overly concerned if there are some small = differences in scrolling using page up on different systems, but I would = like to understand what=92s going on=85 On Dec 27, 2015, at 8:16 AM, Alex Harui wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 12/26/15, 10:06 PM, "Harbs" wrote: >=20 >> A couple of things: >>=20 >> Item I: >>=20 >> There are six tests which have been constantly failing on my machine = for >> a long time. They are all in KeyboardGestureTests, and they are all = tests >> for page up gestures. It looks to me that the resulting indexes are >> different from the expected ones. I adjusted the test outputs to show = the >> differences and here they are: >> 1. pgUpGeneralTest: PgUp failed to select 7/8 page up. Expected = 3332,3332 >> but got 3320,3320 instead. >> 2. shiftPageUpLocationTest: Shift-PageUp failed to move up from image >> sandwich. Expected 460,608 but got 457,608 instead. >> 3. shiftPgUpGeneralTest: Shift-PageUp failed to select 7/8 page up. >> Expected 3332,6067 but got 3320,6067 instead. >> 4. pgUpLocationTest: PageUp failed to move up from image sandwich. >> Expected 460,460 but got 457,457 instead. >> 5. pgUpLanguageTest: PageUp changed movement behavior within right to >> left text. Expected 12,12 but got 51,51 instead. >> 6. shiftPageUpLanguageTest: Shift-PageUp changed movement behavior = within >> right to left text. Expected 12,261 but got 51,261 instead. >>=20 >> Where do the expected values come from? Could there be a difference >> between Windows and Mac? >=20 > Don't know for sure. Should TLF have differences between Mac and Win = if > the fonts are embedded? Are the fonts embedded? >=20 > HTH, > -Alex >=20