flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Mustella fixing (was Re: Next Flex SDK release)
Date Tue, 24 Nov 2015 08:06:34 GMT
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:

> On 11/20/15, 9:05 AM, "omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala"
> <omuppi1@gmail.com on behalf of bigosmallm@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>I took a look at one of the bad.png files from Charts and the fonts were
> >> rendering differently, although I also think I saw a small difference in
> >> the chart lines as well.  For Charts, it would be a good idea to verify
> >> that the fonts are embedded and being used correctly before cutting new
> >> baselines.  Any volunteers?
> >>
> >
> >I will take a look.
> I decided to take a quick peek.  It looks like a change was made to have
> charts use mx:Label instead of s:Label by default.  That could result in
> some surprises for folks who haven't embedded non-CFF fonts in their apps.
>  The mustella tests embed both CFF and nonCFF fonts and thus only see
> subtle rendering differences between TextLine and TextField.
> I'm a bit worried about the backward compatibility impact.  What do others
> think?  Of course, I could be wrong...
For me, this fixed a major issue with Charts.  So, I am okay with this.  I
am used to adding the same font twice, once as CFF and once as nonCFF.
IMHO, this is not a big deal.
I believe this is one of those times where only Mustella would complain :-)


> -Alex

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message