Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 533E218623 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 09:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36800 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2015 09:13:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 36765 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2015 09:13:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 36753 invoked by uid 99); 30 Oct 2015 09:13:49 -0000 Received: from git1-us-west.apache.org (HELO git1-us-west.apache.org) (140.211.11.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 09:13:49 +0000 Received: by git1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at git1-us-west.apache.org, from userid 33) id 6421FE055E; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 09:13:49 +0000 (UTC) From: tomchiverton To: dev@flex.apache.org Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: [GitHub] flex-sdk pull request: Replace string concatenation as argument St... Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20151030091349.6421FE055E@git1-us-west.apache.org> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 09:13:49 +0000 (UTC) Github user tomchiverton commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/pull/24#issuecomment-152466884 I don't see any reasoning behind why this was done - is this approach more performant or something ? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---