Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org
From: Christofer Dutz <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>
To: "dev@flex.apache.org" <dev@flex.apache.org>
Subject: AW: AW: AW: Jenkins builds
Thread-Topic: AW: AW: Jenkins builds
Thread-Index: AQHQ+wRA8ROz9Y4zEkuniDSCgXpXnZ5UnsSb
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 06:37:41 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <DB5PR05MB1285D5D02105842912CB8106A24D0@DB5PR05MB1285.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <D2305701.56EC0%aharui@adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: <D2305701.56EC0%aharui@adobe.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: c-ware.de does not designate
 permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 30 Sep 2015 06:37:41.8795
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 9d387546-1437-4b89-846c-691d64a7e74d
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB5PR05MB1286
X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 
	1;DB5PR05MB1399;2:AUxZfjAQAHTk1//PZWQDSuC8ppBoubzTlGHdTjWfszG1EzWtB8KdzX4wmSMeixRTDmK8bdsG0sSIIPjlVNvYZ05/75dDDl0n13NkgYLavxIY/QjQeRxUQU9EJOSxM4gw1yedwngFr7CA4GA8IT12F/YNYtLKG8Fo92Orojtt+/I=;23:3hxqMc/lh2nYEbXxT3tYVtptUM5hieMeBOYLgEve0MDQf+BbXF+2ykhaDCM9NZK3EGmIH0C3W7c1ZN9S2I467sofA057HMu6/IKLM7XUp85JwQKp2aLYAPzVNDSKaaGQGNwg/chsV4q1HlvanAUlb4hgFJeg7NDj9CRiL45p7ydQZem3lE1Db6Izf2ilBYKF
X-OriginatorOrg: c-ware.de

Well actually it was without the quotes initially and it failled for the sa=
me reasons ... it was my first attempt to fix things, but they didn't work =
:-(

Chris

________________________________________
Von: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com>
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. September 2015 00:14
An: dev@flex.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Jenkins builds

It looks like the quotes fooled some code into thinking it was a relative
path.  Hopefully the next build will pass or at least get past this point.

-Alex

On 9/29/15, 2:46 PM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de> wrote:

>Ok ... so I managed to get even more "blue balls" on builds.apache.org
>... unfortunately I'm currently stuck with Falcon ... the problem should
>be trivial, but it seems that the path to the Flash Debugger is totally
>screwed up ... it's always set to the workspace + the path on drive C,
>but I didn't quite understand how the ant script creates this ... could
>you please have a look ... it should be easy to fix this:
>
>https://builds.apache.org/view/E-G/view/Flex/job/flex-falcon/
>
>Chris
>
>________________________________________
>Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>
>Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. September 2015 18:24
>An: dev@flex.apache.org
>Betreff: AW: AW: Jenkins builds
>
>Have to admit that it was probably me being lost in the target names ...
>there seem to be 1000 targets that sort of sound like they are the one
>you want, but actually you have to use the right one. I had a nother look
>and took another target and it actually worked ... doing the
>"binary-release" thing seems to have been a bad idea ;-)
>
>But in the end I did manage to get the build working by resolving some of
>the cyclic dependencies (No need for BLAZEDS_HOME as this is loaded from
>Maven Central). Did another few changes to the build files and comitted
>them in a separate branch. The build now no longer downloads a Flex SDK
>for the fontkit libraries and instead the libs are loaded directly. This
>sort of matches to the agreement the user had to accept ... as he never
>agreed to download the Adobe Flex SDK.
>
>With these changes I was able to get a lot of jobs Blue again ... please
>have a look at my changes ... I'll merge them back to develop as soon as
>I'm back from Budapest.
>
>Chris
>
>________________________________________
>Von: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com>
>Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. September 2015 16:57
>An: dev@flex.apache.org
>Betreff: Re: AW: Jenkins builds
>
>On 9/29/15, 4:16 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de> wrote:
>
>>While I'm trying to get the builds running on the ASF Jenkins, I noticed
>>something strange:
>>In order to run the tests in framework/tests/basicTests, I need the
>>mustella.swc ... unfortunately this is build after the basicTests are
>>run. It seems that the only purpose of this is to have the test end and
>>report the results back. If I comment out this dependency, the build
>>proceeds, but I have to manually kill the flash player.
>>
>>After that the build continues and the mustella.swc is created and I can
>>comment in the last three lines of BasicTests-config.xml
>>
>>This seems rather strange ...
>
>I don=92t see this in the build.xml.  Checkintests runs basictests-mustell=
a
>which depends on mustella-setup  so mustella-setup will run before the
>steps in basictests-mustella and mustella-setup is where the mustella.swc
>is created.
>
>-Alex