flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
Subject RE: [Falcon.jx] -library-path
Date Mon, 01 Jun 2015 22:07:38 GMT
> I had thoughts of teaching


> CompJSC to stuff the JS files into the same swc specified by the -output


> option, but ran out of time.

Do you mean we could compile SWC(+JS) into one compilation phase ?

Frédéric THOMAS

> From: webdoublefx@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [Falcon.jx] -library-path
> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 23:04:19 +0100
> 
> > BTW, assuming we’ll have Mike’s AS to JS compiler, the JS files will soon
> > be generated by running a CompC like tool.  I had thoughts of teaching
> > CompJSC to stuff the JS files into the same swc specified by the -output
> > option, but ran out of time.
> 
> I would like to see that happening.
> 
> 1- I didn't follow totally the thread relative to what mike what doing, do you mean it
will do all the job that the COMPJSC does when converting AS to JS ?
> 
> 2- I'm chaining the compiler calls and I'm about to generate the JS (first compilation
phase) to the sub-output folder and include those JS files into the SWC on the second compilation
phase.
> 
> Doing so, with what I already did, it would result in IntelliJ that the user will have
the same kind of configuration than today except he will have to set the custom intellij-config.xml
preferabily at project level and set -js-output-type=FLEXJS_DUAL in additional compiler arguments.
> 
> 
> Frédéric THOMAS
> 
> > From: aharui@adobe.com
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [Falcon.jx] -library-path
> > Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 20:47:33 +0000
> > 
> > BTW, assuming we’ll have Mike’s AS to JS compiler, the JS files will soon
> > be generated by running a CompC like tool.  I had thoughts of teaching
> > CompJSC to stuff the JS files into the same swc specified by the -output
> > option, but ran out of time.
> > 
> > -Alex
> > 
> > On 6/1/15, 11:46 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoublefx@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > >> The drawback is there are too much build confs and args too
> > >pass, I guess it can refrain the users, I would like to make it more
> > >friendly:
> > >> 
> > >> - compile both swc + js or swf + js if -js-output-type=FLEXJS_DUAL,
> > > calling chained both of the compiler having generated the include-file
> > >first
> > >> - add a include-all-classes and exclude-classes
> > >
> > >It seems I won't have to do the second item.
> > >Instead I created a /ide/IntelliJ/flex-config.xml that overrides as
> > >needed the intelliJ one, doing so, we benefit of the IntelliJ
> > >configuration too, the override can be done, per module or per project,
> > >this one is more convenient when the project contains only FlexJS
> > >relative stuffs.
> > >
> > >I would have liked its option to include files into the swc be as smart
> > >as the include-files but it is not, it doesn't remap the entry, it only
> > >includes the file with the same path.
> > >
> > >So, I still need to implement the first item.
> > >
> > >Frédéric THOMAS
> > >
> > >> From: aharui@adobe.com
> > >> To: webdoublefx@hotmail.com; dev@flex.apache.org
> > >> Subject: Re: [Falcon.jx] -library-path
> > >> Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 20:30:45 +0000
> > >> 
> > >> I'm in favor of automating any repetitive process. Things are the way
> > >>they are due to lack of time.
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> ------ Original message------
> > >> 
> > >> From: Frédéric THOMAS
> > >> 
> > >> Date: Sat, May 30, 2015 1:24 PM
> > >> 
> > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org;
> > >> 
> > >> Subject:RE: [Falcon.jx] -library-path
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> It worked better but compilation failed with one error but the problem
> > >>hasn't been reported, I will have to dig into.
> > >> 
> > >> The drawback is there are too much build confs and args too pass, I
> > >>guess it can refrain the users, I would like to make it more friendly:
> > >> 
> > >> - compile both swc + js or swf + js if -js-output-type=FLEXJS_DUAL,
> > >>calling chained both of the compiler having generated the include-file
> > >>first
> > >> - add a include-all-classes and exclude-classes
> > >> 
> > >> Thought ?
> > >> 
> > >> Frédéric THOMAS
> > >> 
> > >> > From: aharui@adobe.com
> > >> > To: webdoublefx@hotmail.com; dev@flex.apache.org
> > >> > Subject: Re: [Falcon.jx] -library-path
> > >> > Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 19:33:04 +0000
> > >> >
> > >> > The swcs we build use include-file in compile-config.xml. we
> > >>currently run compc after compjsc.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > ------ Original message------
> > >> >
> > >> > From: Frédéric THOMAS
> > >> >
> > >> > Date: Sat, May 30, 2015 12:28 PM
> > >> >
> > >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org;
> > >> >
> > >> > Subject:RE: [Falcon.jx] -library-path
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > > Is this with ij or ant as well?
> > >> >
> > >> > I build the lib with IJ using the default flex-config.xml and no
> > >>other argument, it results in a swc without the JS, adding
> > >>-js-output-type=FLEXJS, I get the js, my question was, is there already
> > >>something to build the swc included the js (and catalog updated I guess)
> > >>?
> > >> >
> > >> > >From ant we build framework swc and compile apps
> > >> >
> > >> > I didn't get that !?
> > >> >
> > >> > Frédéric THOMAS
> > >> >
> > >> > > From: aharui@adobe.com
> > >> > > To: webdoublefx@hotmail.com; dev@flex.apache.org
> > >> > > Subject: Re: [Falcon.jx] -library-path
> > >> > > Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 19:21:22 +0000
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Is this with ij or ant as well? From ant we build framework swc
and
> > >>compile apps
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > ------ Original message------
> > >> > >
> > >> > > From: Frédéric THOMAS
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Date: Sat, May 30, 2015 11:58 AM
> > >> > >
> > >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>;
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Subject:[Falcon.jx] -library-path
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Hi,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I was trying to compile an App with a Lib in FlexJS and seen
few
> > >>things:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > - The MXMLFlexJSPublisher doesn't pass the the ProblemQuery to
> > >>GoogDepsWriter.getListOfFile, we end up with a NPE (easy to fix)
> > >> > > - The addDeps() throws a RTE instead of a Problem, what do we
want
> > >>as Problem here ?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Adding models/MyModel.js to the swc didn't work for me, I didn't
> > >>check but my guess is because it was not added to the catalog ?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > How am I suppose to proceed to compile in the same time my swc
/ js
> > >>and having it included ?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Frédéric THOMAS
> > >> >
> > >> 
> > > 		 	   		  
> > 
>  		 	   		  
 		 	   		  
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message