flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: [FalconJX FlexJS] JQuery up and running, a nightmare but we now have 1.9 in AS
Date Tue, 23 Jun 2015 00:19:36 GMT


On 6/22/15, 2:50 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoublefx@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> I’ve been pondering what the packaging options might be. Right now folks
>> are getting things to run because after we cross-compile the AS to JS,
>> Google Closure Library classes are mixed in in order to get scripts
>> loaded, and an index.html is generated to call all of that. We might
>>give
>> folks options for different “Publishers" that package different
>> bootstrapping infrastructure with the cross-compiled code.
>
>Just been back in front of my computer, was out and I'm almost about
>going to sleep but was wondering, in the user perspective how it would
>look like having different publishers that package different
>bootstrapping infrastructure with the cross-compiled code ?
>
>I was thinking much more about loading scripts or css from AS at Class
>level, a thing like:
>[dowloadJSlibrary(src='https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.9.0/
>jquery.min.js', type='text/javascript')]

It might be worth finding examples for other bootstrap infrastructure, or
hand-creating some on your own then comparing patterns with what we’re
doing for Google Closure.

The FlexJS Publisher handles CSS aggregated from defaults.css files in the
SWCs

-Alex

Mime
View raw message