flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Schmalle <teotigraphix...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
Date Sat, 13 Jun 2015 15:06:59 GMT
Great job Fred, so this means we just need the FlexJS SDK and it will work
right? Do we still have to setup a library for code completion etc.?

I really want to try the JS.swc in this new build. :)

Mike

On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Frédéric THOMAS <webdoublefx@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Alex,
>
> I understand what you did but not sure I could reproduce, I wasn't that
> far in my experiment but I still miss the complete round trip logic of
> jBurg, I guess I would need to spend more time on it to get it better.
>
> Whatever, that's awesome, we can now compile and debug without any
> dependencies on the Flex SDK in IntelliJ :-) big up !!
>
> I will commit soon what I've done too.
>
> Thanks,
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
>
> ----------------------------------------
> > From: aharui@adobe.com
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> > Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 22:19:47 +0000
> >
> > OK, I think I got it. Try my latest commit.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 6/12/15, 12:41 PM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >>OK, I will work on it. Thanks for trying, it is rather strange stuff.
> >>
> >>On 6/12/15, 9:16 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoublefx@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi Alex,
> >>>
> >>>Well, I've been trying to get why I always get a cost "not feasible" for
> >>>your function but I'm failing to understand the logic of jBurg, maybe
> >>>seing your solution will unligthen me but at the moment I'm totally in
> >>>the dark.
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message