flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Frédéric THOMAS <webdoubl...@hotmail.com>
Subject RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
Date Sat, 30 May 2015 15:58:10 GMT
Ok good luck :)

1 question though, did you plan to re-apply all the fix from the sdk\modules\debugger when
done ?

Btw I pushed what I hope is my last commit on my compiler branch.

Frédéric THOMAS

> From: aharui@adobe.com
> To: webdoublefx@hotmail.com; dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 15:05:45 +0000
> 
> There was a class missing from the donation that looked like it abstracted as4 and as3.
I've been trying to figure out what it does. I think I'll get it done tonight. I was passing
the burm the top of the ast. I think it wants a child node.
> 
> 
> Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
> 
> 
> ------ Original message------
> 
> From: Frédéric THOMAS
> 
> Date: Sat, May 30, 2015 7:42 AM
> 
> To: dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>;
> 
> Subject:RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> 
> 
> Hi Alex,
> 
> Are you saying the AS3DebuggerReducer doesn't work ?
> 
> Frédéric THOMAS
> 
> > From: aharui@adobe.com
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> > Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 18:09:10 +0000
> >
> > OK, I’m still working out the kinks of FDB calling Falcon to evaluate
> > expressions.  That’s in the BURM code so who knows how long that will take.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 5/29/15, 10:20 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoublefx@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Hi Alex,
> > >
> > >I spent some time checking if it is was possible to let the minimum of
> > >classes to make IJ happy, it turns out that or at least seems to be the
> > >minimum already.
> > >The only thing I committed and not yet pushed is the factorisation of the
> > >fixArg function, it was on my way and I don't like duplicated, confusing
> > >or even not used code :-)
> > >
> > >So, I guess I will do a push by tomorrow, feel free to review / fix /
> > >rebase on it for FDB
> > >
> > >Frédéric THOMAS
> > >
> > >> From: webdoublefx@hotmail.com
> > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > >> Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> > >> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 19:51:10 +0100
> > >>
> > >> Ah yes, you make me think I didn't stub the things I could have
> > >>probably avoid some classes from the swfutils, will do that in the week
> > >>end
> > >>
> > >> Frédéric THOMAS
> > >>
> > >> > From: webdoublefx@hotmail.com
> > >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > >> > Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> > >> > Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 19:48:43 +0100
> > >> >
> > >> > > I’ll try integrating your stuff then.  I looked at your changes
a
> > >>few days
> > >> > > ago and it looked reasonable.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks for that but I pushed force my branch changing some code (in
> > >>better I hope) and the build too.
> > >> >
> > >> > > Just to be sure, does this still require some parts of a regular
> > >>Flex SDK
> > >> > > or is a FlexJS SDK now working on its own?
> > >> >
> > >> > Yes, the swfutils.jar but I've seen something in the build.xml that
> > >>didn't work for me, it was a copy of the required classes to
> > >>falcon/swfutils, maybe you can fix that along with your FDB work as If
> > >>IIUC, you was about to do it for FDB ?
> > >> >
> > >> > Aso, the user still has to add the FlexJS lib as dependency in IJ
> > >>otherwise everything is red.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Frédéric THOMAS
> > >> >
> > >> > > From: aharui@adobe.com
> > >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > >> > > Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> > >> > > Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 18:39:58 +0000
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Awesome!  I hope to finish up FDB this week and then work on
> > >>packaging.
> > >> > > I’ll try integrating your stuff then.  I looked at your changes
a
> > >>few days
> > >> > > ago and it looked reasonable.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Just to be sure, does this still require some parts of a regular
> > >>Flex SDK
> > >> > > or is a FlexJS SDK now working on its own?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > -Alex
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On 5/28/15, 11:22 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoublefx@hotmail.com>
> > >>wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >Almost the end.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >So, to come back on this, at the moment with my current
> > >>implementation,
> > >> > > >we can compile Applications and Libraries and link them together
> > >> > > >overriding the IntelliJ configuration as show here
> > >> > > >http://snag.gy/5SzuG.jpg the second build configuarion suffixed
by
> > >>_JS
> > >> > > >guess what, is to compile to JS, to create it, it's enough
to copy
> > >>the
> > >> > > >first build configuration and add the -js-output-type to
any of the
> > >> > > >current valid output type.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Not perfect and not what I was hoping but still, that's much
more
> > >>better
> > >> > > >than using external tools and it is per build configuration,
not
> > >>one for
> > >> > > >all of your projects.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >A better integration could happen if I find time to code
an
> > >>IntelliJ
> > >> > > >plugin for FlexJS though, let see first how it will be adopted,
the
> > >> > > >current integration seems still pretty descent.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >So, I would like better compiler expert to review my code
as it
> > >>was my
> > >> > > >first compiler contribution, the branch is IDEA_JS_COMPILER
> > >>(sorry, I
> > >> > > >forgot to prefix with ticket ID)
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Maybe it would be opportune to create a binary kit for people
> > >>would want
> > >> > > >to test it and return feedback, maybe we can also wait for
the
> > >>Alex work
> > >> > > >about FDB and see how to deal better with swfutils.jar as
at the
> > >>moment
> > >> > > >I'm using the one of the Flex SDK.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >thought ?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Thanks,
> > >> > > >Frédéric THOMAS
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> From: webdoublefx@hotmail.com
> > >> > > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > >> > > >> Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> > >> > > >> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 14:41:03 +0100
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> The result of the empty spark.css [1] :-)
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> If I let only the NS, it creates the swf but crashes
because it
> > >>can't
> > >> > > >>find IStateClient2
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Frédéric THOMAS
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> [1]
> > >> > > >> Error:[DataBindingTest]: : java.lang.NullPointerException
     at
> > >> > >
> > >>>>org.antlr.runtime.tree.BaseTreeAdaptor.isNil(BaseTreeAdaptor.java:73)
> > >> > > >>  at
> > >> > >
> > >>>>org.antlr.runtime.tree.CommonTreeNodeStream.nextElement(CommonTreeNodeS
> > >>>>tr
> > >> > > >>eam.java:104)      at
> > >> > >
> > >>>>org.antlr.runtime.misc.LookaheadStream.fill(LookaheadStream.java:113)
> > >> > > >>  at
> > >> > >
> > >>>>org.antlr.runtime.misc.LookaheadStream.syncAhead(LookaheadStream.java:1
> > >>>>07
> > >> > > >>)      at
> > >> > >
> > >>>>org.antlr.runtime.misc.LookaheadStream.LT(LookaheadStream.java:129)
> > >> > > >>at
> > >> > >
> > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.css.CSSTree.stylesheet(CSSTree.java:2
> > >>>>00
> > >> > > >>)      at
> > >> > >
> > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.css.CSSDocument.parse(CSSDocument.jav
> > >>>>a:
> > >> > > >>81)      at
> > >> > >
> > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.caches.CSSDocumentCache$CSSDocumentCa
> > >>>>ch
> > >> > > >>eKey2.parse(CSSDocumentCache.java:280)      at
> > >> > >
> > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.caches.CSSDocumentCache.createEntryVa
> > >>>>lu
> > >> > > >>e(CSSDocumentCache.java:323)      at
> > >> > >
> > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.caches.CSSDocumentCache.createEntryVa
> > >>>>lu
> > >> > > >>e(CSSDocumentCache.java:54)      at
> > >> > >
> > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.caches.ConcurrentCacheStoreBase.get(C
> > >>>>on
> > >> > > >>currentCacheStoreBase.java:69)      at
> > >> > >
> > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.css.CSSManager.getCSSFromThemes(CSSMa
> > >>>>na
> > >> > > >>ger.java:251)      at
> > >> > >
> > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.FlexAppSWFTarget.collectTheme
> > >>>>s(
> > >> > > >>FlexAppSWFTarget.java:553)      at
> > >> > >
> > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.FlexAppSWFTarget.findAllCompi
> > >>>>la
> > >> > > >>tionUnitsToLink(FlexAppSWFTarget.java:493)      at
> > >> > >
> > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.Target.buildAllCompilationUni
> > >>>>ts
> > >> > > >>(Target.java:297)      at
> > >> > >
> > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.Target.getBuiltCompilationUni
> > >>>>tS
> > >> > > >>et(Target.java:306)      at
> > >> > >
> > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.SWFTarget.build(SWFTarget.jav
> > >>>>a:
> > >> > > >>228)      at
> > >> > >
> > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.buildSWFModel(MXMLC.java:760)
> > >> > > >> at
> > >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.buildArtifact(MXMLC.java:746)
> > >> > > >>     at
> > >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.compile(MXMLC.java:625)
> > >> > > >>   at
> > >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.compile(MXMLC.java:611)
> > >> > > >> at
> > >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.mainNoExit(MXMLC.java:230)
> > >> > > >>  at
> > >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.mainNoExit(MXMLC.java:198)
> > >> > > >>   at
> > >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.execute(MXMLC.java:185)
> > >> > > >> at flex2.tools.Tool.compile(Tool.java:62)      at
> > >> > > >>flex2.tools.Mxmlc.mxmlc(Mxmlc.java:72)      at
> > >> > >
> > >>>>com.intellij.flex.compiler.flex4.Flex4Handler.compileSwf(Flex4Handler.j
> > >>>>av
> > >> > > >>a:81)      at
> > >> > >
> > >>>>com.intellij.flex.compiler.CompilationThread.run(CompilationThread.java
> > >>>>:4
> > >> > > >>8)
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > From: webdoublefx@hotmail.com
> > >> > > >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > >> > > >> > Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> > >> > > >> > Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 14:09:29 +0100
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > > Just quickly, I noticed the gist contains
a different set of
> > >> > > >>namespaces,
> > >> > > >> > > therefore excluding all of our new components,
and still had
> > >>a theme
> > >> > > >> > > pointing at spark.css.  The flex-config.xml
in a FlexJS SDK
> > >>has a
> > >> > > >> > > different set of manifest.xml files and nothing
in the theme
> > >>tag.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > Not sure at all it would help, my guess is that
it has its own
> > >>rule
> > >> > > >>to write its config.xml, the only way I guess would be
a plugin to
> > >> > > >>override its behaviour.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > > And for the theme, maybe an empty Spark.css
will work.
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > I can try that
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > Frédéric THOMAS
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > > From: aharui@adobe.com
> > >> > > >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > >> > > >> > > Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ
Integration
> > >> > > >> > > Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 12:58:45 +0000
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > Hi Fred,
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > Just quickly, I noticed the gist contains
a different set of
> > >> > > >>namespaces,
> > >> > > >> > > therefore excluding all of our new components,
and still had
> > >>a theme
> > >> > > >> > > pointing at spark.css.  The flex-config.xml
in a FlexJS SDK
> > >>has a
> > >> > > >> > > different set of manifest.xml files and nothing
in the theme
> > >>tag.
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > I wonder if leaving a basic-manifest.xml in
the SDK folder
> > >>will
> > >> > > >>convince
> > >> > > >> > > IJ to use that, or if we have to copy basic-manifest
into
> > >> > > >>mxml-manifest.
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > And for the theme, maybe an empty Spark.css
will work.
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > Thanks for digging into this,
> > >> > > >> > > -Alex
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > On 5/28/15, 3:57 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS"
> > >><webdoublefx@hotmail.com>
> > >> > > >>wrote:
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > >Actually, it is more complicated.
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > > >This is what it is generated by IJ:
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > > >https://gist.github.com/doublefx/ae135f1886cc2800c08d
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > > >And I added the flex-config.xml from the
framework, this one
> > >> > > >>overrides
> > >> > > >> > > >the one of IJ apparently
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > > >it results:
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > > >Information:28/05/2015 11:16 - Compilation
completed with 7
> > >>errors
> > >> > > >>and 11
> > >> > > >> > > >warnings
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >>>U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\DataBindingTest.mxml
> > >> > > >> > > >Error:(26, 19) [DataBindingTest]: Call
to a possibly
> > >>undefined
> > >> > > >>method
> > >> > > >> > > >MyModel.
> > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(30, 15) [DataBindingTest]: Definition
> > >>models.MyModel
> > >> > > >>could not
> > >> > > >> > > >be found.
> > >> > > >> > > >Error:(40, 8) [DataBindingTest]: This
tag could not be
> > >>resolved to
> > >> > > >>an
> > >> > > >> > > >ActionScript class. It will be ignored.
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >>>U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\MyInitialView.mxml
> > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(26, 10) [DataBindingTest]: Definition
> > >>models.MyModel
> > >> > > >>could not
> > >> > > >> > > >be found.
> > >> > > >> > > >Error:(53, 24) [DataBindingTest]: Call
to a possibly
> > >>undefined
> > >> > > >>method
> > >> > > >> > > >MyModel.
> > >> > > >> > > >Error:(54, 27) [DataBindingTest]: Call
to a possibly
> > >>undefined
> > >> > > >>method
> > >> > > >> > > >MyModel.
> > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(119, 50) [DataBindingTest]: Data
binding will not
> > >>be able
> > >> > > >>to
> > >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'MyModel'.
> > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(119, 76) [DataBindingTest]: Data
binding will not
> > >>be able
> > >> > > >>to
> > >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'stockSymbol'.
> > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(123, 63) [DataBindingTest]: Data
binding will not
> > >>be able
> > >> > > >>to
> > >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'MyModel'.
> > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(123, 89) [DataBindingTest]: Data
binding will not
> > >>be able
> > >> > > >>to
> > >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'responseText'.
> > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(131, 50) [DataBindingTest]: Data
binding will not
> > >>be able
> > >> > > >>to
> > >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'MyModel'.
> > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(131, 76) [DataBindingTest]: Data
binding will not
> > >>be able
> > >> > > >>to
> > >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'strings'.
> > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(143, 30) [DataBindingTest]: Data
binding will not
> > >>be able
> > >> > > >>to
> > >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'MyModel'.
> > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(143, 56) [DataBindingTest]: Data
binding will not
> > >>be able
> > >> > > >>to
> > >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'allData'.
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >>>>>U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\controllers\MyController
> > >>>>>.a
> > >> > > >>>s
> > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(26, 11) [DataBindingTest]: Definition
> > >>models.MyModel
> > >> > > >>could not
> > >> > > >> > > >be found.
> > >> > > >> > > >Error:(61, 3) [DataBindingTest]: Call
to a possibly
> > >>undefined
> > >> > > >>method
> > >> > > >> > > >MyModel.
> > >> > > >> > > >Error:(66, 3) [DataBindingTest]: Call
to a possibly
> > >>undefined
> > >> > > >>method
> > >> > > >> > > >MyModel.
> > >> > > >> > > >Error:(71, 12) [DataBindingTest]: Call
to a possibly
> > >>undefined
> > >> > > >>method
> > >> > > >> > > >MyModel.
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > > >But if I pass directly to Mxmlc :
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >>>>>-load-config="D:\SDKs\FlexJS\0.0.3_FP16.0_AIR16.0_en_US\frameworks\fle
> > >>>>>x-
> > >> > > >>>co
> > >> > > >> > > >nfig.xml"
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >>>>>-output=U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\bin\DataBindingTest.
> > >>>>>sw
> > >> > > >>>f
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >>>>>-library-path+=U:/sources/flexJsProjects/DataBindingTest/libs/libTest.
> > >>>>>sw
> > >> > > >>>c
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >>>U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\DataBindingTest.mxml
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > > >It builds.
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > > >And if I ommit the flex-config.xml from
the framework, it
> > >>results
> > >> > > >>in
> > >> > > >> > > >compilation error because it can't find
> > >>mxml-2009-manifest.xml
> > >> > > >>neither
> > >> > > >> > > >the bundle resources, actually, the locale
folder in my
> > >>FlexJS SDK
> > >> > > >>is
> > >> > > >> > > >empty, it I fill it with the locales of
my Flex SDK, the
> > >> > > >>compilation
> > >> > > >> > > >fails because the
> > >> > > >> > > >it can't find the components from the
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >>>>>D:\SDKs\FlexJS\0.0.3_FP16.0_AIR16.0_en_US\frameworks\themes\Spark\spar
> > >>>>>k.
> > >> > > >>>cs
> > >> > > >> > > >s
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > > >Frédéric THOMAS
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > > >> From: webdoublefx@hotmail.com
> > >> > > >> > > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > >> > > >> > > >> Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS]
IntelliJ Integration
> > >> > > >> > > >> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 08:47:26 +0100
> > >> > > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > > >> Hi,
> > >> > > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > > >> Adding support for Comp C / JSC,
I've been able to
> > >>compile swc
> > >> > > >>and js
> > >> > > >> > > >>files from IntelliJ.
> > >> > > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > > >> In IntelliJ, I still have to add
the FlexJS as a Lib to
> > >>have
> > >> > > >>things
> > >> > > >> > > >>green though, also, despite, it passes
a correct
> > >>config.xml, the
> > >> > > >>MXMLC
> > >> > > >> > > >>compiler can't find the classe in
the lib (the class is in
> > >>the
> > >> > > >>lib and
> > >> > > >> > > >>the lib is well referenced, I tried
with both include path
> > >>and
> > >> > > >>external
> > >> > > >> > > >>and had the same result), did someone
already tried this
> > >>kind of
> > >> > > >>config ?
> > >> > > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > > >> Thanks,
> > >> > > >> > > >> Frédéric THOMAS
> > >> > > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > > >> > From: webdoublefx@hotmail.com
> > >> > > >> > > >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > >> > > >> > > >> > Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS]
IntelliJ Integration
> > >> > > >> > > >> > Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 01:12:22
+0100
> > >> > > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > If you modify the Configuration
class in
> > >>flex-oem-compiler
> > >> > > >>does it
> > >> > > >> > > >>get
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > used or does IJ have its
own version?  If you can use
> > >>a
> > >> > > >>modified
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > Configuration, you might
be able to change
> > >> > > >>getCompilerConfiguration
> > >> > > >> > > >>to
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > call OEMUtil, or maybe
some earlier call can call
> > >>OEMUtil
> > >> > > >>and store
> > >> > > >> > > >>the
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > config someplace.
> > >> > > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > > >> > Yeah, I was thinking to stub
most of the legacy config
> > >>and
> > >> > > >>still make
> > >> > > >> > > >>IJ happy.
> > >> > > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > Just so I understand: does
this mean the FlexJS SDK
> > >>can do
> > >> > > >>these
> > >> > > >> > > >>things in
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > IJ without overlaying a
regular Flex SDK or being a
> > >>library
> > >> > > >>within a
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > regular Flex SDK?
> > >> > > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > > >> > For some reasons I didn't get
yet (didn't dug into
> > >>either, we
> > >> > > >>still
> > >> > > >> > > >>need to add the FlexJS Lib  + FlexJS
SDK
> > >> > > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > > >> > Frédéric THOMAS
> > >> > > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > From: aharui@adobe.com
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW:
[FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > Date: Tue, 26 May 2015
23:58:16 +0000
> > >> > > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > On 5/26/15, 4:41 PM, "Frédéric
THOMAS"
> > >> > > >><webdoublefx@hotmail.com>
> > >> > > >> > > >>wrote:
> > >> > > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> I may not be understanding
the issue, but if you
> > >>look at
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> flex2/tools/oem/internal/OEMUtil.java
I believe
> > >>there is
> > >> > > >>code in
> > >> > > >> > > >>there
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> that calls Falcon’s
MXMLC to get Falcon’s config,
> > >>then
> > >> > > >>populates
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> CompilerConfiguration
from the Falcon config.
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >IJ calls the proccessConfiguration
which returns a
> > >>legacy
> > >> > > >> > > >>Configuration
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >nd from there IJ getCompilerConfiguration(),
so,
> > >>IFAIK, I
> > >> > > >>can't use
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >OEMUtil to give it
directly.
> > >> > > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > If you modify the Configuration
class in
> > >>flex-oem-compiler
> > >> > > >>does it
> > >> > > >> > > >>get
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > used or does IJ have its
own version?  If you can use
> > >>a
> > >> > > >>modified
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > Configuration, you might
be able to change
> > >> > > >>getCompilerConfiguration
> > >> > > >> > > >>to
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > call OEMUtil, or maybe
some earlier call can call
> > >>OEMUtil
> > >> > > >>and store
> > >> > > >> > > >>the
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > config someplace.
> > >> > > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >Anyway, good news,
I can now make / build / compile
> > >>from
> > >> > > >>IntelliJ
> > >> > > >> > > >>to .swf
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >/ .js
> > >> > > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > Just so I understand: does
this mean the FlexJS SDK
> > >>can do
> > >> > > >>these
> > >> > > >> > > >>things in
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > IJ without overlaying a
regular Flex SDK or being a
> > >>library
> > >> > > >>within a
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > regular Flex SDK?
> > >> > > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >It is too late for
me to try to adapt and make it
> > >>build
> > >> > > >>with Ant
> > >> > > >> > > >>tonight
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >though, I'll keep you
in touch.
> > >> > > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > Hey, this is great progress.
 I’m going to be a while
> > >>on the
> > >> > > >>FDB for
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > Falcon so no hurry.
> > >> > > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > >> > > -Alex
> > >> > > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
> 
 		 	   		  
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message