flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE developers to support FlexJS
Date Sun, 10 May 2015 05:41:21 GMT
Have you tried [1]?

It could be out-of-date or unclear, so let us know where you get stuck.

[1] 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Using+FlexJS+with+Adobe+Fl
ash+Builder

On 5/9/15, 2:39 PM, "Genaro Pinson" <geniephupinson@yahoo.com.INVALID>
wrote:

>Can anyone please help me and point me to the right direction on how to
>setup a sample FlexJS project.
>
>
>     On Sunday, May 10, 2015 5:38 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
><webdoublefx@hotmail.com> wrote:
>   
>
> Hi Alex,
>
>Ok, good advice, much more better if I replace -Dflexlib="%FLEX_HOME%
>with -Dflexlib="%FALCON_HOME% in the mxmlc.bat
>
>I'm off for tonight unfortunately, back on track tomorrow if the coming
>party doesn't kill me.
>
>Thanks,
>Frédéric THOMAS
>
>> From: aharui@adobe.com
>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE developers to support FlexJS
>> Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 21:25:08 +0000
>> 
>> Could your DataBindingTest be old code?  If you are using the nightly
>> build, MyInitialView shouldn’t be using mx:State anymore.  Check the
>> latest DataBindingTest code in the examples folder.
>> 
>> Otherwise, I’m trying to figure out how to determine which
>>flex-config.xml
>> it picked up.  Maybe edit the .bat file to remove echo-off so we get
>>more
>> output?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> -Alex
>> 
>> On 5/9/15, 5:55 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoublefx@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >D:\SDKs\FlexJS\0.0.3_FP16.0_AIR16.0_en_US\js\bin\mxmlc.bat
>> >U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\DataBindingTest.mxml
>> >
>> >Result:
>> >
>> >https://gist.github.com/doublefx/f7510ee453dd88e0562a
>> >
>> >Am I missing something ?
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >Frédéric THOMAS
>> >
>> >> From: aharui@adobe.com
>> >> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> >> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE developers to support
>>FlexJS
>> >> Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 18:27:43 +0000
>> >> 
>> >> There shouldn’t be any special arguments as long as MXMC is picking
>>up
>> >>the
>> >> flex-config.xml from the FlexJS directory.  Check the flexlib
>>argument.
>> >> Usually it looks like:
>> >> 
>> >>            +flexlib=<path to FlexJS SDK>/frameworks
>> >> 
>> >> -Alex
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> On 5/8/15, 9:21 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoublefx@hotmail.com>
>>wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> >Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> >What are the compiler args for the mxml version ?
>> >> >
>> >> >Thanks,
>> >> >Frédéric THOMAS
>> >> >
>> >> >> From: aharui@adobe.com
>> >> >> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> >> >> Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE developers to support
>> >>FlexJS
>> >> >> Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 15:59:03 +0000
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> In the examples folder is a DataBindingTest_as folder that has
no
>> >>MXML
>> >> >>if
>> >> >> you want to try that.
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> -Alex
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> On 5/8/15, 8:56 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphixllc@gmail.com>
>> >> >>wrote:
>> >> >> 
>> >> >> >@Alex I must have been having a brain fart, I see no reason
that
>> >> >>IntelliJ
>> >> >> >would hard code that stuff but it makes no sense at all why
it's
>>not
>> >> >> >reading them correctly.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >The only key piece that is different is it's MXML and not an
.as
>> >>file.
>> >> >>So
>> >> >> >I
>> >> >> >haven't tried to see if the classes resolve in a normal .as
file
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Mike
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com>
>> >>wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Gee, I would hope that IntelliJ wouldn’t hard code stuff
like
>> >> >> >>namespaces.
>> >> >> >> If one of you has time, you could create a subclass of
Spark
>> >> >>Application
>> >> >> >> and Spark Label into its own SWC with its own namespace
and
>>see if
>> >> >>you
>> >> >> >>can
>> >> >> >> use that in an IntelliJ Flex “Hello World” project
without any
>> >>Spark
>> >> >>or
>> >> >> >>MX
>> >> >> >> namespaces in the MXML, because that’s essentially what
we are
>> >> >>trying to
>> >> >> >> do.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I noticed from Piotr’s screenshot that it appears that
IntelliJ
>> >>has a
>> >> >> >>few
>> >> >> >> plug-ins for the flex-compiler and also add
>>flex-oem-compiler.jar
>> >>to
>> >> >>the
>> >> >> >> class path.  FlexJS has a hacked up flex-oem-compiler.jar
that
>>has
>> >> >>just
>> >> >> >> enough stuff to fool FB into allowing it to compile FlexJS
>>SWFS.
>> >>It
>> >> >> >>could
>> >> >> >> be that we need a few more hacks there to make IntelliJ
happy.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I also noticed from Piotr’s screenshot that IntelliJ
seems to
>>be
>> >>auto
>> >> >> >> generating an XML file for the -load-config parameter.
 I would
>> >> >>expect
>> >> >> >>the
>> >> >> >> “js” namespace and references to the right SWCs to
be in that
>>XML
>> >> >>file.
>> >> >> >> Maybe IntelliJ doesn’t know how to generate that from
the
>> >> >> >>flex-config.xml
>> >> >> >> in FlexJS.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> If someone can post the contents of such an XML file it
might
>> >>contain
>> >> >> >>some
>> >> >> >> clues.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >> >> -Alex
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On 5/8/15, 3:39 AM, "Michael Schmalle"
>><teotigraphixllc@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >>wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >Ok, been to long, I am an idiot;
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> ><component className="spark.layouts:VerticalLayout"
>> >> >> >>name="VerticalLayout"
>> >> >> >> >uri="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"  />
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> ><component className="org.apache.flex.charts:BarChart"
>> >> >>name="BarChart"
>> >> >> >> >uri="library://ns.apache.org/flexjs/basic"/>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >So actually, IntelliJ is not parsing the manifest
or reading
>>it
>> >> >> >>crrectly.
>> >> >> >> >There is no Difference with FlexJS and Spark's manifest
and
>>app
>> >> >> >> >declarations.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Mike
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 6:34 AM, Michael Schmalle
>> >> >> >> ><teotigraphixllc@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> >wrote:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> Yeah, agreed, and since we don't know what JetBrains
is
>> >>doing...
>> >> >>They
>> >> >> >> >>must
>> >> >> >> >> be hard coding the fx/spark namespaces in the
SDK plugin
>>code.
>> >> >>That
>> >> >> >> >>seems
>> >> >> >> >> like the only reasonable answer to this.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> It's easy to map a package namespace dynamically
but I am
>> >>trying
>> >> >>to
>> >> >> >> >>think
>> >> >> >> >> how a url would get mapped in a SWC since if
I remember,
>>there
>> >>is
>> >> >>no
>> >> >> >> >> namespace definition of a url in the Flex SWC
right? So if
>> >>that is
>> >> >> >>the
>> >> >> >> >> case, a url would have to be hardcoded somewhere
in
>>IntelliJ's
>> >>SDK
>> >> >> >> >>plugin
>> >> >> >> >> code.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Mike
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
>> >> >> >> >><webdoublefx@hotmail.com>
>> >> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>> Yes, what I thought too and was wondering
if we had a kind
>>of
>> >> >>same
>> >> >> >> >>>thing
>> >> >> >> >>> on Randori to manage, apparently not, so,
it has to be
>>done at
>> >> >>some
>> >> >> >> >>>point
>> >> >> >> >>> for FlexJS if we go forward with IJ.
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> Thanks,
>> >> >> >> >>> Frédéric THOMAS
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>> > Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 06:10:31 -0400
>> >> >> >> >>> > Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to
IDE developers to
>> >>support
>> >> >> >> >>>FlexJS
>> >> >> >> >>> > From: teotigraphixllc@gmail.com
>> >> >> >> >>> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> >> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >> >>> > Fred, I don't know exactly what you
did int he plugin but
>> >>if I
>> >> >> >> >>>remember
>> >> >> >> >>> > correctly, we were just unzipping the
rbl, copying the
>>swcs
>> >>to
>> >> >>the
>> >> >> >> >>> > library/sdk location and adding the
SWC to Intellij
>>through
>> >>the
>> >> >> >> >>>plugin
>> >> >> >> >>> > code. Nothing special about namespaces.
>> >> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >> >>> > But, the difference I do know is, we
did not use a url
>>for
>> >> >> >>anything.
>> >> >> >> >>>I
>> >> >> >> >>> have
>> >> >> >> >>> > a feeling the js namespace url is what
is choking
>>IntelliJ.
>> >> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >> >>> > Mike
>> >> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >> >>> > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Frédéric
THOMAS <
>> >> >> >> >>> webdoublefx@hotmail.com>
>> >> >> >> >>> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>> >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > Hi,
>> >> >> >> >>> > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > The red means that the IDE
is not resolving the jx
>> >> >>namespace.
>> >> >> >>So
>> >> >> >> >>>it
>> >> >> >> >>> seems
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > to be a SWC namespace problem
where something is
>> >>happening
>> >> >> >>that
>> >> >> >> >>> IntelliJ
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > doesn't read and resolve the
manifest correctly.
>> >> >> >> >>> > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > You are right and that's 2 years
or so I didn't touch
>>the
>> >> >> >>IntelliJ
>> >> >> >> >>> API,
>> >> >> >> >>> > > so, can't remember if we worked
on the NS or not.
>> >> >> >> >>> > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > Why a plugin: Intellij has
features that make
>>creating
>> >> >> >>projects
>> >> >> >> >>>and
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > dependencies easy. One reason,
Fred can say I am
>>wrong
>> >>is
>> >> >>to
>> >> >> >> >>>define
>> >> >> >> >>> a
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > FlexJS SDK type that can be
created. I am a bit rusty
>> >>but I
>> >> >> >>know
>> >> >> >> >>> there
>> >> >> >> >>> > > are
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > benefits.
>> >> >> >> >>> > > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > You are also correct that
it can be run as an
>>external
>> >> >>tool as
>> >> >> >> >>> well. I
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > guess it's just a matter of
fiddling with things
>>until
>> >> >> >>something
>> >> >> >> >>> works
>> >> >> >> >>> > > and
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > is not a workflow killer.
>> >> >> >> >>> > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > Yep and now I'm not sure anymore,
I still need to
>>confirm
>> >>or
>> >> >> >> >>>infirm I
>> >> >> >> >>> can
>> >> >> >> >>> > > switch on Facet as I can't remember
for sure how the
>>Flex
>> >> >>Plugin
>> >> >> >> >>> considers
>> >> >> >> >>> > > it is a Flex SDK or not, that's
a long time and I will
>> >>need
>> >> >>to
>> >> >> >>dig
>> >> >> >> >>> into
>> >> >> >> >>> > > again.
>> >> >> >> >>> > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > One question for the Flash Develop
guys though, how are
>> >>the
>> >> >> >> >>> intelli-sense
>> >> >> >> >>> > > / refactoring / code navigation
/ hints and other IDE
>> >> >>facilities
>> >> >> >> >>> including
>> >> >> >> >>> > > maven integration compared to IntelliJ,
do we have a
>> >> >>comparative
>> >> >> >> >>> table ?
>> >> >> >> >>> > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > Thanks,
>> >> >> >> >>> > > Frédéric THOMAS
>> >> >> >> >>> > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 11:29:43
-0400
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > Subject: Re: [FlexJS] Reaching
out to IDE developers
>>to
>> >> >> >>support
>> >> >> >> >>> FlexJS
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > From: teotigraphixllc@gmail.com
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> >> >> >> >>> > > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > The red means that the IDE
is not resolving the jx
>> >> >>namespace.
>> >> >> >>So
>> >> >> >> >>>it
>> >> >> >> >>> seems
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > to be a SWC namespace problem
where something is
>> >>happening
>> >> >> >>that
>> >> >> >> >>> IntelliJ
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > doesn't read and resolve the
manifest correctly.
>> >> >> >> >>> > > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > Why a plugin: Intellij has
features that make
>>creating
>> >> >> >>projects
>> >> >> >> >>>and
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > dependencies easy. One reason,
Fred can say I am
>>wrong
>> >>is
>> >> >>to
>> >> >> >> >>>define
>> >> >> >> >>> a
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > FlexJS SDK type that can be
created. I am a bit rusty
>> >>but I
>> >> >> >>know
>> >> >> >> >>> there
>> >> >> >> >>> > > are
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > benefits.
>> >> >> >> >>> > > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > You are also correct that
it can be run as an
>>external
>> >> >>tool as
>> >> >> >> >>> well. I
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > guess it's just a matter of
fiddling with things
>>until
>> >> >> >>something
>> >> >> >> >>> works
>> >> >> >> >>> > > and
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > is not a workflow killer.
>> >> >> >> >>> > > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 11:20
AM, Alex Harui
>> >> >><aharui@adobe.com>
>> >> >> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>> > > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > Hi Fred,
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > Thanks for trying.  One
question though:  why is a
>> >> >>plug-in
>> >> >> >>even
>> >> >> >> >>> > > needed?  I
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > was told by an IntelliJ
engineer that they simply
>>call
>> >> >> >>mxmlc.
>> >> >> >> >>>If
>> >> >> >> >>> > > that’s
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > true, then it should
“just work”. Piotr’s
>>screenshot
>> >> >>sort of
>> >> >> >> >>> implied
>> >> >> >> >>> > > that
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > the compiler may have
run or does IntelliJ have a
>> >> >>different
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > code-intelligence engine
and that’s what we’re
>>seeing
>> >>in
>> >> >>the
>> >> >> >> >>> errors.
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > @Piotr, am I right that
the things in red in the
>> >> >>screenshot
>> >> >> >>are
>> >> >> >> >>> errors?
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > What was the actual error
output?
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > -Alex
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > On 5/7/15, 6:06 AM, "Frédéric
THOMAS"
>> >> >> >><webdoublefx@hotmail.com
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >Hi Mike,
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >Yes I just started
and it is on my little spare
>>time
>> >> >>but if
>> >> >> >> >>>you
>> >> >> >> >>> want
>> >> >> >> >>> > > an
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >idea of what's going
on, you can try to compile it
>> >>and
>> >> >>you
>> >> >> >> >>>will
>> >> >> >> >>> see
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >things have changed
and I need to figure out what
>>to
>> >>use
>> >> >> >>now
>> >> >> >> >>> instead
>> >> >> >> >>> > > of
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >BrowsersConfiguaration,
ModuleChunk, the
>>deprecated
>> >> >> >> >>> > > TranslatingCompiler,
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >etc.. and at the
moment I don't know yet where to
>> >>find
>> >> >>that
>> >> >> >> >>>out
>> >> >> >> >>> given
>> >> >> >> >>> > > the
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >poor documentation,
will have to skim the source
>> >>code I
>> >> >> >>guess.
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >Frédéric THOMAS
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> Date: Thu, 7
May 2015 07:58:28 -0400
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> Subject: Re:
[FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE
>> >>developers
>> >> >>to
>> >> >> >> >>>support
>> >> >> >> >>> > > FlexJS
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> From: teotigraphixllc@gmail.com
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >>
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> Fred, I didn't
know you were giving that a go. I
>> >>don't
>> >> >> >>have
>> >> >> >> >>> enough
>> >> >> >> >>> > > time
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >>to
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> get into the
plugin if that is what you are
>>working
>> >> >>on,
>> >> >> >> >>>which
>> >> >> >> >>> is
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >>fantastic
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> if you are.
But, I am willing to try and match
>>your
>> >> >>time
>> >> >> >>if
>> >> >> >> >>> you are
>> >> >> >> >>> > > now
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> devoting (some)time
to trying an Intellij
>>plugin.
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >>
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> I guess there
is work to be done on FalconJx, I
>> >>know
>> >> >> >>when I
>> >> >> >> >>> left
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >>developing
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> it I had a bunch
of todos left and unit tests to
>> >> >>write.
>> >> >> >>This
>> >> >> >> >>> was my
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >>whole
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> quandary, for
the time I would have to donate, I
>> >>need
>> >> >> >> >>>Intellij
>> >> >> >> >>> and
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >>really
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> don't want to
use FlashBuilder since it's crusty
>> >>and
>> >> >> >>gets no
>> >> >> >> >>> love.
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >>
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> Keep me updated
with what you are doing.
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >>
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> Mike
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >>
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >>
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> On Thu, May
7, 2015 at 7:36 AM, Frédéric THOMAS
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >><webdoublefx@hotmail.com>
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >>
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > Hi,
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > A bit of
updates:
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > - I understood
FlexJS got rid of the Flex SDK
>> >> >> >> >>>depnedencies,
>> >> >> >> >>> if
>> >> >> >> >>> > > yes, I
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >>will
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > need to
stick mostly on my same base code,
>>can't
>> >> >>use a
>> >> >> >> >>>facet
>> >> >> >> >>> > > AFAIK.
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > - I've
been trying to compile the Randori
>>plugin
>> >> >> >>against
>> >> >> >> >>>the
>> >> >> >> >>> last
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >>IntelliJ
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > but many
things have changed in their code
>>base
>> >>and
>> >> >>it
>> >> >> >> >>> failed to
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >>compile,
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > will have
to fix that first before to branch
>>it.
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > So, we
are still far to have a working plugin
>>at
>> >> >>this
>> >> >> >> >>>stage
>> >> >> >> >>> and
>> >> >> >> >>> > > given
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >>the
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > time I
can spend on it.
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > Any IntelliJ
plugin guru to give a hand ?
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > Thanks,
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > Frédéric
THOMAS
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > > Date:
Thu, 7 May 2015 03:00:30 -0700
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > > From:
piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > > To:
dev@flex.apache.org
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > > Subject:
Re: [FlexJS] Reaching out to IDE
>> >> >>developers
>> >> >> >>to
>> >> >> >> >>> support
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >>FlexJS
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > > Additionally
I have checked also new
>>version of
>> >> >> >>FlexJS
>> >> >> >> >>> with FDT
>> >> >> >> >>> > > and
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >>it
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > > doesn't
work anymore.
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > > I
have error during to compilation that
>> >>FlexJS.swc
>> >> >> >> >>>doesn't
>> >> >> >> >>> > > exists -
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >>We
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > have
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > > currently
bunch of swcs.
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > > I
am not sure do we need to contact with FDT
>> >>team
>> >> >>?
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > > Alex,
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > > After
your changes to many swcs in FlexJS -
>>Did
>> >> >>you
>> >> >> >> >>>have to
>> >> >> >> >>> > > change
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > process
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > > of
creation/import new project to FB in some
>> >>way ?
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > > Piotr
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > > -----
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > > Apache
Flex PMC
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > > piotrzarzycki21@gmail.com
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > > --
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > > View
this message in context:
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >>
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > >
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> 
>> >> 
>> 
>>>>>>http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Reaching-
>>>>>>ou
>> >>>>t
>> >> >> >> >>>-
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > >
>> >>>>to-IDE-developers-to-support-FlexJS-tp32656p46277.html
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> > > Sent
from the Apache Flex Development
>>mailing
>> >>list
>> >> >> >> >>>archive
>> >> >> >> >>> at
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >>Nabble.com.
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >> >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > > > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > >
>> >> >> >> >>> > >
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> 
>> >> >            
>> >> 
>> >               
>> 
>                  
>
>  

Mime
View raw message