flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Schmalle <teotigraphix...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
Date Fri, 29 May 2015 18:19:06 GMT
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:

> OK, I’m still working out the kinks of FDB calling Falcon to evaluate
> expressions.  That’s in the BURM code so who knows how long that will take.
>

I have this image of a huge pile of garbage and you digging around trying
to find a receipt.

Mike


>
> -Alex
>
> On 5/29/15, 10:20 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoublefx@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi Alex,
> >
> >I spent some time checking if it is was possible to let the minimum of
> >classes to make IJ happy, it turns out that or at least seems to be the
> >minimum already.
> >The only thing I committed and not yet pushed is the factorisation of the
> >fixArg function, it was on my way and I don't like duplicated, confusing
> >or even not used code :-)
> >
> >So, I guess I will do a push by tomorrow, feel free to review / fix /
> >rebase on it for FDB
> >
> >Frédéric THOMAS
> >
> >> From: webdoublefx@hotmail.com
> >> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >> Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> >> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 19:51:10 +0100
> >>
> >> Ah yes, you make me think I didn't stub the things I could have
> >>probably avoid some classes from the swfutils, will do that in the week
> >>end
> >>
> >> Frédéric THOMAS
> >>
> >> > From: webdoublefx@hotmail.com
> >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >> > Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> >> > Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 19:48:43 +0100
> >> >
> >> > > I’ll try integrating your stuff then.  I looked at your changes
a
> >>few days
> >> > > ago and it looked reasonable.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for that but I pushed force my branch changing some code (in
> >>better I hope) and the build too.
> >> >
> >> > > Just to be sure, does this still require some parts of a regular
> >>Flex SDK
> >> > > or is a FlexJS SDK now working on its own?
> >> >
> >> > Yes, the swfutils.jar but I've seen something in the build.xml that
> >>didn't work for me, it was a copy of the required classes to
> >>falcon/swfutils, maybe you can fix that along with your FDB work as If
> >>IIUC, you was about to do it for FDB ?
> >> >
> >> > Aso, the user still has to add the FlexJS lib as dependency in IJ
> >>otherwise everything is red.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Frédéric THOMAS
> >> >
> >> > > From: aharui@adobe.com
> >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >> > > Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> >> > > Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 18:39:58 +0000
> >> > >
> >> > > Awesome!  I hope to finish up FDB this week and then work on
> >>packaging.
> >> > > I’ll try integrating your stuff then.  I looked at your changes
a
> >>few days
> >> > > ago and it looked reasonable.
> >> > >
> >> > > Just to be sure, does this still require some parts of a regular
> >>Flex SDK
> >> > > or is a FlexJS SDK now working on its own?
> >> > >
> >> > > -Alex
> >> > >
> >> > > On 5/28/15, 11:22 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoublefx@hotmail.com>
> >>wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >Almost the end.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >So, to come back on this, at the moment with my current
> >>implementation,
> >> > > >we can compile Applications and Libraries and link them together
> >> > > >overriding the IntelliJ configuration as show here
> >> > > >http://snag.gy/5SzuG.jpg the second build configuarion suffixed
by
> >>_JS
> >> > > >guess what, is to compile to JS, to create it, it's enough to
copy
> >>the
> >> > > >first build configuration and add the -js-output-type to any of
the
> >> > > >current valid output type.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Not perfect and not what I was hoping but still, that's much more
> >>better
> >> > > >than using external tools and it is per build configuration, not
> >>one for
> >> > > >all of your projects.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >A better integration could happen if I find time to code an
> >>IntelliJ
> >> > > >plugin for FlexJS though, let see first how it will be adopted,
the
> >> > > >current integration seems still pretty descent.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >So, I would like better compiler expert to review my code as it
> >>was my
> >> > > >first compiler contribution, the branch is IDEA_JS_COMPILER
> >>(sorry, I
> >> > > >forgot to prefix with ticket ID)
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Maybe it would be opportune to create a binary kit for people
> >>would want
> >> > > >to test it and return feedback, maybe we can also wait for the
> >>Alex work
> >> > > >about FDB and see how to deal better with swfutils.jar as at the
> >>moment
> >> > > >I'm using the one of the Flex SDK.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >thought ?
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Thanks,
> >> > > >Frédéric THOMAS
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> From: webdoublefx@hotmail.com
> >> > > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >> > > >> Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> >> > > >> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 14:41:03 +0100
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> The result of the empty spark.css [1] :-)
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> If I let only the NS, it creates the swf but crashes because
it
> >>can't
> >> > > >>find IStateClient2
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Frédéric THOMAS
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> [1]
> >> > > >> Error:[DataBindingTest]: : java.lang.NullPointerException
     at
> >> > >
> >>>>org.antlr.runtime.tree.BaseTreeAdaptor.isNil(BaseTreeAdaptor.java:73)
> >> > > >>  at
> >> > >
> >>>>org.antlr.runtime.tree.CommonTreeNodeStream.nextElement(CommonTreeNodeS
> >>>>tr
> >> > > >>eam.java:104)      at
> >> > >
> >>>>org.antlr.runtime.misc.LookaheadStream.fill(LookaheadStream.java:113)
> >> > > >>  at
> >> > >
> >>>>org.antlr.runtime.misc.LookaheadStream.syncAhead(LookaheadStream.java:1
> >>>>07
> >> > > >>)      at
> >> > >
> >>>>org.antlr.runtime.misc.LookaheadStream.LT(LookaheadStream.java:129)
> >> > > >>at
> >> > >
> >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.css.CSSTree.stylesheet(CSSTree.java:2
> >>>>00
> >> > > >>)      at
> >> > >
> >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.css.CSSDocument.parse(CSSDocument.jav
> >>>>a:
> >> > > >>81)      at
> >> > >
> >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.caches.CSSDocumentCache$CSSDocumentCa
> >>>>ch
> >> > > >>eKey2.parse(CSSDocumentCache.java:280)      at
> >> > >
> >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.caches.CSSDocumentCache.createEntryVa
> >>>>lu
> >> > > >>e(CSSDocumentCache.java:323)      at
> >> > >
> >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.caches.CSSDocumentCache.createEntryVa
> >>>>lu
> >> > > >>e(CSSDocumentCache.java:54)      at
> >> > >
> >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.caches.ConcurrentCacheStoreBase.get(C
> >>>>on
> >> > > >>currentCacheStoreBase.java:69)      at
> >> > >
> >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.css.CSSManager.getCSSFromThemes(CSSMa
> >>>>na
> >> > > >>ger.java:251)      at
> >> > >
> >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.FlexAppSWFTarget.collectTheme
> >>>>s(
> >> > > >>FlexAppSWFTarget.java:553)      at
> >> > >
> >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.FlexAppSWFTarget.findAllCompi
> >>>>la
> >> > > >>tionUnitsToLink(FlexAppSWFTarget.java:493)      at
> >> > >
> >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.Target.buildAllCompilationUni
> >>>>ts
> >> > > >>(Target.java:297)      at
> >> > >
> >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.Target.getBuiltCompilationUni
> >>>>tS
> >> > > >>et(Target.java:306)      at
> >> > >
> >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.SWFTarget.build(SWFTarget.jav
> >>>>a:
> >> > > >>228)      at
> >> > >
> >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.buildSWFModel(MXMLC.java:760)
> >> > > >> at
> >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.buildArtifact(MXMLC.java:746)
> >> > > >>     at
> >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.compile(MXMLC.java:625)
> >> > > >>   at
> >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.compile(MXMLC.java:611)
> >> > > >> at
> >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.mainNoExit(MXMLC.java:230)
> >> > > >>  at
> >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.mainNoExit(MXMLC.java:198)
> >> > > >>   at
> >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.execute(MXMLC.java:185)
> >> > > >> at flex2.tools.Tool.compile(Tool.java:62)      at
> >> > > >>flex2.tools.Mxmlc.mxmlc(Mxmlc.java:72)      at
> >> > >
> >>>>com.intellij.flex.compiler.flex4.Flex4Handler.compileSwf(Flex4Handler.j
> >>>>av
> >> > > >>a:81)      at
> >> > >
> >>>>com.intellij.flex.compiler.CompilationThread.run(CompilationThread.java
> >>>>:4
> >> > > >>8)
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> > From: webdoublefx@hotmail.com
> >> > > >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >> > > >> > Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> >> > > >> > Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 14:09:29 +0100
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > > Just quickly, I noticed the gist contains a different
set of
> >> > > >>namespaces,
> >> > > >> > > therefore excluding all of our new components,
and still had
> >>a theme
> >> > > >> > > pointing at spark.css.  The flex-config.xml in
a FlexJS SDK
> >>has a
> >> > > >> > > different set of manifest.xml files and nothing
in the theme
> >>tag.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > Not sure at all it would help, my guess is that it has
its own
> >>rule
> >> > > >>to write its config.xml, the only way I guess would be a plugin
to
> >> > > >>override its behaviour.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > > And for the theme, maybe an empty Spark.css will
work.
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > I can try that
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > Frédéric THOMAS
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > > From: aharui@adobe.com
> >> > > >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >> > > >> > > Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration
> >> > > >> > > Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 12:58:45 +0000
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > Hi Fred,
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > Just quickly, I noticed the gist contains a different
set of
> >> > > >>namespaces,
> >> > > >> > > therefore excluding all of our new components,
and still had
> >>a theme
> >> > > >> > > pointing at spark.css.  The flex-config.xml in
a FlexJS SDK
> >>has a
> >> > > >> > > different set of manifest.xml files and nothing
in the theme
> >>tag.
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > I wonder if leaving a basic-manifest.xml in the
SDK folder
> >>will
> >> > > >>convince
> >> > > >> > > IJ to use that, or if we have to copy basic-manifest
into
> >> > > >>mxml-manifest.
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > And for the theme, maybe an empty Spark.css will
work.
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > Thanks for digging into this,
> >> > > >> > > -Alex
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > On 5/28/15, 3:57 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS"
> >><webdoublefx@hotmail.com>
> >> > > >>wrote:
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > >Actually, it is more complicated.
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > >This is what it is generated by IJ:
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > >https://gist.github.com/doublefx/ae135f1886cc2800c08d
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > >And I added the flex-config.xml from the framework,
this one
> >> > > >>overrides
> >> > > >> > > >the one of IJ apparently
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > >it results:
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > >Information:28/05/2015 11:16 - Compilation
completed with 7
> >>errors
> >> > > >>and 11
> >> > > >> > > >warnings
> >> > > >> > >
> >>>U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\DataBindingTest.mxml
> >> > > >> > > >Error:(26, 19) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a
possibly
> >>undefined
> >> > > >>method
> >> > > >> > > >MyModel.
> >> > > >> > > >Warning:(30, 15) [DataBindingTest]: Definition
> >>models.MyModel
> >> > > >>could not
> >> > > >> > > >be found.
> >> > > >> > > >Error:(40, 8) [DataBindingTest]: This tag could
not be
> >>resolved to
> >> > > >>an
> >> > > >> > > >ActionScript class. It will be ignored.
> >> > > >> > >
> >>>U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\MyInitialView.mxml
> >> > > >> > > >Warning:(26, 10) [DataBindingTest]: Definition
> >>models.MyModel
> >> > > >>could not
> >> > > >> > > >be found.
> >> > > >> > > >Error:(53, 24) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a
possibly
> >>undefined
> >> > > >>method
> >> > > >> > > >MyModel.
> >> > > >> > > >Error:(54, 27) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a
possibly
> >>undefined
> >> > > >>method
> >> > > >> > > >MyModel.
> >> > > >> > > >Warning:(119, 50) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding
will not
> >>be able
> >> > > >>to
> >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'MyModel'.
> >> > > >> > > >Warning:(119, 76) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding
will not
> >>be able
> >> > > >>to
> >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'stockSymbol'.
> >> > > >> > > >Warning:(123, 63) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding
will not
> >>be able
> >> > > >>to
> >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'MyModel'.
> >> > > >> > > >Warning:(123, 89) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding
will not
> >>be able
> >> > > >>to
> >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'responseText'.
> >> > > >> > > >Warning:(131, 50) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding
will not
> >>be able
> >> > > >>to
> >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'MyModel'.
> >> > > >> > > >Warning:(131, 76) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding
will not
> >>be able
> >> > > >>to
> >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'strings'.
> >> > > >> > > >Warning:(143, 30) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding
will not
> >>be able
> >> > > >>to
> >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'MyModel'.
> >> > > >> > > >Warning:(143, 56) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding
will not
> >>be able
> >> > > >>to
> >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'allData'.
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > >
> >>>>>U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\controllers\MyController
> >>>>>.a
> >> > > >>>s
> >> > > >> > > >Warning:(26, 11) [DataBindingTest]: Definition
> >>models.MyModel
> >> > > >>could not
> >> > > >> > > >be found.
> >> > > >> > > >Error:(61, 3) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a
possibly
> >>undefined
> >> > > >>method
> >> > > >> > > >MyModel.
> >> > > >> > > >Error:(66, 3) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a
possibly
> >>undefined
> >> > > >>method
> >> > > >> > > >MyModel.
> >> > > >> > > >Error:(71, 12) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a
possibly
> >>undefined
> >> > > >>method
> >> > > >> > > >MyModel.
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > >But if I pass directly to Mxmlc :
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > >
> >>>>>-load-config="D:\SDKs\FlexJS\0.0.3_FP16.0_AIR16.0_en_US\frameworks\fle
> >>>>>x-
> >> > > >>>co
> >> > > >> > > >nfig.xml"
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > >
> >>>>>-output=U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\bin\DataBindingTest.
> >>>>>sw
> >> > > >>>f
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > >
> >>>>>-library-path+=U:/sources/flexJsProjects/DataBindingTest/libs/libTest.
> >>>>>sw
> >> > > >>>c
> >> > > >> > >
> >>>U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\DataBindingTest.mxml
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > >It builds.
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > >And if I ommit the flex-config.xml from the
framework, it
> >>results
> >> > > >>in
> >> > > >> > > >compilation error because it can't find
> >>mxml-2009-manifest.xml
> >> > > >>neither
> >> > > >> > > >the bundle resources, actually, the locale
folder in my
> >>FlexJS SDK
> >> > > >>is
> >> > > >> > > >empty, it I fill it with the locales of my
Flex SDK, the
> >> > > >>compilation
> >> > > >> > > >fails because the
> >> > > >> > > >it can't find the components from the
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > >
> >>>>>D:\SDKs\FlexJS\0.0.3_FP16.0_AIR16.0_en_US\frameworks\themes\Spark\spar
> >>>>>k.
> >> > > >>>cs
> >> > > >> > > >s
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > >Frédéric THOMAS
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > >> From: webdoublefx@hotmail.com
> >> > > >> > > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >> > > >> > > >> Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ
Integration
> >> > > >> > > >> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 08:47:26 +0100
> >> > > >> > > >>
> >> > > >> > > >> Hi,
> >> > > >> > > >>
> >> > > >> > > >> Adding support for Comp C / JSC, I've
been able to
> >>compile swc
> >> > > >>and js
> >> > > >> > > >>files from IntelliJ.
> >> > > >> > > >>
> >> > > >> > > >> In IntelliJ, I still have to add the FlexJS
as a Lib to
> >>have
> >> > > >>things
> >> > > >> > > >>green though, also, despite, it passes
a correct
> >>config.xml, the
> >> > > >>MXMLC
> >> > > >> > > >>compiler can't find the classe in the lib
(the class is in
> >>the
> >> > > >>lib and
> >> > > >> > > >>the lib is well referenced, I tried with
both include path
> >>and
> >> > > >>external
> >> > > >> > > >>and had the same result), did someone already
tried this
> >>kind of
> >> > > >>config ?
> >> > > >> > > >>
> >> > > >> > > >> Thanks,
> >> > > >> > > >> Frédéric THOMAS
> >> > > >> > > >>
> >> > > >> > > >> > From: webdoublefx@hotmail.com
> >> > > >> > > >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >> > > >> > > >> > Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS]
IntelliJ Integration
> >> > > >> > > >> > Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 01:12:22 +0100
> >> > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > > >> > > If you modify the Configuration
class in
> >>flex-oem-compiler
> >> > > >>does it
> >> > > >> > > >>get
> >> > > >> > > >> > > used or does IJ have its own
version?  If you can use
> >>a
> >> > > >>modified
> >> > > >> > > >> > > Configuration, you might be
able to change
> >> > > >>getCompilerConfiguration
> >> > > >> > > >>to
> >> > > >> > > >> > > call OEMUtil, or maybe some
earlier call can call
> >>OEMUtil
> >> > > >>and store
> >> > > >> > > >>the
> >> > > >> > > >> > > config someplace.
> >> > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > > >> > Yeah, I was thinking to stub most
of the legacy config
> >>and
> >> > > >>still make
> >> > > >> > > >>IJ happy.
> >> > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > > >> > > Just so I understand: does this
mean the FlexJS SDK
> >>can do
> >> > > >>these
> >> > > >> > > >>things in
> >> > > >> > > >> > > IJ without overlaying a regular
Flex SDK or being a
> >>library
> >> > > >>within a
> >> > > >> > > >> > > regular Flex SDK?
> >> > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > > >> > For some reasons I didn't get yet
(didn't dug into
> >>either, we
> >> > > >>still
> >> > > >> > > >>need to add the FlexJS Lib  + FlexJS SDK
> >> > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > > >> > Frédéric THOMAS
> >> > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > > >> > > From: aharui@adobe.com
> >> > > >> > > >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >> > > >> > > >> > > Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS]
IntelliJ Integration
> >> > > >> > > >> > > Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 23:58:16
+0000
> >> > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > >> > > On 5/26/15, 4:41 PM, "Frédéric
THOMAS"
> >> > > >><webdoublefx@hotmail.com>
> >> > > >> > > >>wrote:
> >> > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> I may not be understanding
the issue, but if you
> >>look at
> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> flex2/tools/oem/internal/OEMUtil.java
I believe
> >>there is
> >> > > >>code in
> >> > > >> > > >>there
> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> that calls Falcon’s
MXMLC to get Falcon’s config,
> >>then
> >> > > >>populates
> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> CompilerConfiguration
from the Falcon config.
> >> > > >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > >> > > >IJ calls the proccessConfiguration
which returns a
> >>legacy
> >> > > >> > > >>Configuration
> >> > > >> > > >> > > >nd from there IJ getCompilerConfiguration(),
so,
> >>IFAIK, I
> >> > > >>can't use
> >> > > >> > > >> > > >OEMUtil to give it directly.
> >> > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > >> > > If you modify the Configuration
class in
> >>flex-oem-compiler
> >> > > >>does it
> >> > > >> > > >>get
> >> > > >> > > >> > > used or does IJ have its own
version?  If you can use
> >>a
> >> > > >>modified
> >> > > >> > > >> > > Configuration, you might be
able to change
> >> > > >>getCompilerConfiguration
> >> > > >> > > >>to
> >> > > >> > > >> > > call OEMUtil, or maybe some
earlier call can call
> >>OEMUtil
> >> > > >>and store
> >> > > >> > > >>the
> >> > > >> > > >> > > config someplace.
> >> > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > >> > > >Anyway, good news, I can
now make / build / compile
> >>from
> >> > > >>IntelliJ
> >> > > >> > > >>to .swf
> >> > > >> > > >> > > >/ .js
> >> > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > >> > > Just so I understand: does this
mean the FlexJS SDK
> >>can do
> >> > > >>these
> >> > > >> > > >>things in
> >> > > >> > > >> > > IJ without overlaying a regular
Flex SDK or being a
> >>library
> >> > > >>within a
> >> > > >> > > >> > > regular Flex SDK?
> >> > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > > >> > > >It is too late for me to
try to adapt and make it
> >>build
> >> > > >>with Ant
> >> > > >> > > >>tonight
> >> > > >> > > >> > > >though, I'll keep you in
touch.
> >> > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > >> > > Hey, this is great progress.
 I’m going to be a while
> >>on the
> >> > > >>FDB for
> >> > > >> > > >> > > Falcon so no hurry.
> >> > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > >> > > -Alex
> >> > > >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > > >>
> >> > > >> > > >
> >> > > >> > >
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message