Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 08FDC1776F for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40402 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2015 18:05:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 40363 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2015 18:05:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 40349 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2015 18:05:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:05:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of omuppi1@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.179] (HELO mail-ob0-f179.google.com) (209.85.214.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:05:20 +0000 Received: by obcxo2 with SMTP id xo2so13781975obc.0 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:04:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=ASwWDBimQCLslFYA0AgOauVfQTJ1fAgvc/DhJYUvFg4=; b=ih+OzZwJQlYOQc21jSv1UifwhoCyLAnfTdCB8yPxm1jbTsQKGdUCkyW5udrEsuyu27 XsOvcWyZmk3xvKp0zrCe1Dl7PhboIpbYEyRabtBe837tckZq0TH/krEm+E7YNwOZIHgT 8OdcagDw1e+G/8kxelT035gpfCz964hEhg03GjxeOz55mHfEHWGKcPkRDmutEvb98IoJ GBt7EBZA6GWnRd/RM8oI3OY4yn9PcEiKxtrwyl1eMCNpD1uG0rOxdfA+S3wIzFh0CT+b SC6TwZIRN2RhTtg16yOFK35dQJxmJnGW1X+cfbnD96yF3MSFjQITllJ23VOyYsiQpDZL 2PUw== X-Received: by 10.60.51.102 with SMTP id j6mr53325344oeo.34.1426615474128; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:04:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: omuppi1@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.229.76 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:04:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: OmPrakash Muppirala Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:04:03 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: WeBe-XN3zQPK8qxpLsrVPQ85VV8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [4.14.1] no help, no release To: "dev@flex.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c30a68910db505117fcca6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c30a68910db505117fcca6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > Wow, does GMail not like two threads with the same subject on > different mailing lists... :-) > > Anyway, back on dev@: > > The release process is where it was when it was started: > > - the branches are cut > - the tests are running on those branches > - the JIRA for the SDK release is created and updated > - the nightly builds for both branches are running > > What needs to be done for the SDK (at least): > - the docs need updating/completing > If I understand correct, that means the README and RELEASE_NOTES. I can start working on this right away. Are there any other docs to be updated? > > What needs to be done for the Installer (at least): > - final commits to solve the most pressing problems need to land > - a JIRA with subs for the release steps needs to be created > - the docs need updating > - the legal stuff needs an OK (which may already have happened, I may > of missed that) > - testing in the wild will surely help, given the fickle nature of the > stuff we're trying to solve... > The subject of this email says 4.14.1. I don't think we need to release both at the same time, right? > > The above is a summary, the JIRA tickets (should) have all the details. > Please point to the JIRA tickets? If you have sent an email out before, send a link to that one. Thanks, Om > > Thanks, > > EdB > > > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > > We are were we started: the branches are cut, the builds are running, > > the SDK release JIRA is created and updated, and... nothing. > > > > Let's take this back to dev@ > > > > EdB > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:16 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala > > wrote: > >> On Mar 16, 2015 11:33 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> This message is meant for everyone who thinks that if they wait long > >>> enough, a release will spontaneously materialize. Or worse, that > >>> someone else picks up the effort and it will get done anyway. That is > >>> not how Open Source works. You have to help out if you want to move a > >>> project forward... > >>> > >>> I don't have the cycles to do much of the release work (update docs, > >>> test builds, fix regressions etc.) myself, so if no-one moves, nothing > >>> will happen. > >> > >> Can you give an update as to where things are with the release process? > >> What can I do to help? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Om > >> > >>> > >>> EdB > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Ix Multimedia Software > >>> > >>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 > >>> 3521 VB Utrecht > >>> > >>> T. 06-51952295 > >>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl > > > > > > > > -- > > Ix Multimedia Software > > > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > > 3521 VB Utrecht > > > > T. 06-51952295 > > I. www.ixsoftware.nl > > > > -- > Ix Multimedia Software > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > 3521 VB Utrecht > > T. 06-51952295 > I. www.ixsoftware.nl > --001a11c30a68910db505117fcca6--