Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 72FB117CD2 for ; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 13:26:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98221 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2015 13:26:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 98183 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2015 13:26:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 98172 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2015 13:26:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 13:26:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of christofer.dutz@c-ware.de designates 157.55.234.144 as permitted sender) Received: from [157.55.234.144] (HELO emea01-db3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) (157.55.234.144) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 13:25:41 +0000 Received: from AM2PR05MB1169.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.163.147.25) by AM2PR05MB1185.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.163.148.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.125.19; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 13:25:39 +0000 Received: from AM2PR05MB1169.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.163.147.25) by AM2PR05MB1169.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (25.163.147.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.125.19; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 13:25:38 +0000 Received: from AM2PR05MB1169.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.163.147.25]) by AM2PR05MB1169.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com ([25.163.147.25]) with mapi id 15.01.0125.002; Sat, 28 Mar 2015 13:25:38 +0000 From: Christofer Dutz To: "'dev@flex.apache.org'" Subject: Do you think the Mavenizer is mature enough to be released? Thread-Topic: Do you think the Mavenizer is mature enough to be released? Thread-Index: AdBpWmGdtvbht3D1T9G8Z30xvE5JLA== Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 13:25:38 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US Content-Language: de-DE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [84.150.124.58] authentication-results: flex.apache.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:AM2PR05MB1169;UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:AM2PR05MB1185; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-forefront-antispam-report: BMV:1;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(2900100001)(19300405004)(102836002)(66066001)(122556002)(87936001)(62966003)(92566002)(77156002)(50986999)(54356999)(74316001)(107886001)(16236675004)(86362001)(33656002)(75402003)(110136001)(74482002)(19625215002)(46102003)(229853001)(19580395003)(450100001)(40100003)(2656002)(76576001)(15975445007)(491001)(19627235001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:AM2PR05MB1169;H:AM2PR05MB1169.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;MLV:sfv;LANG:en; x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(5002010);SRVR:AM2PR05MB1169;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:AM2PR05MB1169; x-forefront-prvs: 05299D545B Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_AM2PR05MB1169BC1A56EB5477C734070CA2F70AM2PR05MB1169eurp_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 28 Mar 2015 13:25:38.6002 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 9d387546-1437-4b89-846c-691d64a7e74d X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM2PR05MB1169 X-OriginatorOrg: c-ware.de X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_AM2PR05MB1169BC1A56EB5477C734070CA2F70AM2PR05MB1169eurp_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I was just initiating the release of Flexmojos 7.1.0, but currently can't d= o that as I have a dependency to the Apache Flex Mavenizer. So prior to releasing Flexmojos, I would need to release the Mavenizer. I t= hink it's pretty mature, but would like to ask you about your oppinion? Also I would like to ask Justin to give it it's legal review ;-) .... But a= t least as all of the code is produced by us, I doubt there should be any t= rouble with this. Chris --_000_AM2PR05MB1169BC1A56EB5477C734070CA2F70AM2PR05MB1169eurp_--