flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Eric <eh.fx...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Swiz Donation?
Date Tue, 10 Feb 2015 05:17:51 GMT
On boilerplate, I was referring to the ServiceHelper class & default 
fault handlers, not so much IoC. But if the general consensus is to not 
bother with adding these things to the core SDK, so be it. I was hoping 
it would make it in, just because Swiz is essentially defunct otherwise.


On 2/9/2015 11:10 AM, Gary Yang wrote:
> Oh, Please do NOT merge it into the SDK, IOC is not the only way to void
> boilerplate, and Swiz is not the only way to IOC!
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Eric <eh.fxdev@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> That's a shame. I agree the entire framework might be a bit much, but
>> IoC/Dependency Injection, ServiceHelper and default fault handler support
>> (all optional features) really helped fill in some gaps and avoid
>> boilerplate.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/8/2015 7:19 AM, Carlos Rovira wrote:
>>
>>> No. It was not merged.
>>>
>>> I was in contact with chris (the author of swiz), and although he had the
>>> intention to make the donation he was very busy to make it happen, so
>>> things where left and nothing happens in the end.
>>>
>>> 2015-02-08 12:48 GMT+01:00 Jeffry Houser <jeffry@dot-com-it.com>:
>>>
>>>   On 2/6/2015 9:10 PM, Eric wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   Hello,
>>>>> Is Swiz still going to be merged into the standard SDK?  Or has that
>>>>> happened already?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>      Has Swiz been donated?  I thought there was talk of it at some
>>>> point in
>>>> the past, but I thought it never happened.
>>>>
>>>>    To my knowledge Swiz has not been merged into the standard SDK. Even if
>>>> it were donated; I have mixed feelings about whether it should be or not
>>>> merged into the main Flex SDK or remain separate.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jeffry Houser
>>>> Technical Entrepreneur
>>>> http://www.jeffryhouser.com
>>>> 203-379-0773
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>


Mime
View raw message