flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>
Subject Re: [4.14] binary vs. source package legal docs
Date Sat, 03 Jan 2015 12:29:18 GMT

> Are you proposing to add the entire text of W3C to LICENSE or a pointer to
> a separate file stored somewhere?

 A pointer is the preferred method.

>  Are you also claiming that Batik’s NOTICE is wrong?

It most likely wrong- but either way we bundle the xml-* jars so need to modify LICENSE and
NOTICE accordingly.

> The portion below is already in for Xalan isn’t it?  It is unclear whether
> it needs to be duplicated or not.

It would be clearer if it was duplicated and  what it applies to mentioned.

> Did you get this from the jar or somewhere else?

From the jar.

View raw message