Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6807810F74 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 11:05:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 80687 invoked by uid 500); 5 Dec 2014 11:05:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 80652 invoked by uid 500); 5 Dec 2014 11:05:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 80641 invoked by uid 99); 5 Dec 2014 11:05:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 11:05:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.213.179] (HELO mail-ig0-f179.google.com) (209.85.213.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 11:05:04 +0000 Received: by mail-ig0-f179.google.com with SMTP id r2so523567igi.0 for ; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 03:04:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=O7kGZsBywInZpryN5cv77Pk0SD6PgUPFREe5njZeUzE=; b=T3JoUn/Jqyrd/l8Ekjmt2siJeaTg83lY6taRWtGjVce04sdzYdg/CxjKHeQO6E/zCo yXU9qd9pzw/ehiKvK2be4Owq0wqUWn8/09v2yjIVB5fiUIIDYlGv5H//8W3Z74Iaq5dJ 4M/lelLPHRyV2UYRLNOOrSXnYU0g73ieaJzcILeqbQlzczuNUZvFLBoiS0PzBIkIGe9b NyJZXdCcVlVaBAGmJfuNnQkEbIRvg33gsvYmSIfRwuXeXYDIrlhPJKAvOJe6EGVDMQlt WCEypZr2QjyNoMeuD1s2BtRsub7LSmzJd0kU00EMRf/FTceT9ielpGcOHA1weW+Ew/MQ lnSQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnzUhzSIrDLzmXS93Y2bKZWFByW4MScl2zPcU8IpRRatrReyxSPWnbtMKuRrMfZ/NUFxTv/ X-Received: by 10.43.99.3 with SMTP id cq3mr15287055icc.49.1417777458328; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 03:04:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.128.65 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 03:03:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7211F7CC-F8D5-46E6-8633-B4DCF372BE16@gmail.com> References: <7211F7CC-F8D5-46E6-8633-B4DCF372BE16@gmail.com> From: Erik de Bruin Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 12:03:58 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Allow RC votes to carry over at any point in the release process To: "dev@flex.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 (binding) The RM should treat an explicit statement indicating the wish to carry over a vote the same as voting again. EdB On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Harbs wrote: > I suggest that at any point in the release process a vote should be carried over if the person voting indicates they wish the vote should carry over. > > +1 > > Harbs -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl