Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of windowns@gmail.com designates
 209.85.218.45 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D0A62840.205F4%aharui@adobe.com>
References: 
 <CAJs+wW13+5jDX7pVY5pKF0OxFFP+CD6WmG3bE2XrBaQMLQ04rg@mail.gmail.com>
	<9089E000-AFA8-4199-B625-1766FBB586AE@classsoftware.com>
	<CAJs+wW0Ns+xhRHsYDc-O+gnVai9RUeCXxmwwXOCtgJPhtOjU1Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<8553E20B-E70D-4096-BB96-80C2F405C886@classsoftware.com>
	<CAEWfVJmjadsceND05fMrg7+bpn1ZcEUnbmMCoLDFB5pnpeyz8Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<E48FEF45-1144-4F71-AEEF-0F900447C348@classsoftware.com>
	<CAJs+wW0zd+j_H4uSi0adeHL=qgwXL58w805KZtvTHDSjXu4sig@mail.gmail.com>
	<9392084C-B545-4DB7-B250-0BEF24F13330@gmail.com>
	<7FDF8236-C435-4FB0-BC0C-53FD3F7D1159@classsoftware.com>
	<CACK5iZe_CbGAZ3-nTSsLWAgrKVRaD18Fzg8v3ur=P7j_2Sgq9A@mail.gmail.com>
	<9D08FCA7-CD2A-41F1-AE4F-46678AB9AAEE@classsoftware.com>
	<CACK5iZd+=RxL70WVEJAkEghoBsaxmu1sT5QfpGuXRgHLULA1jw@mail.gmail.com>
	<5AC8D76B-D726-4968-8872-70ED59CF982C@classsoftware.com>
	<D0A62840.205F4%aharui@adobe.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 16:16:01 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAEsjxkL31T3v0WkRaG_c8QYp+pRrnkenAjJHSbaSpe4oAv8UUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: The 'less-RC' process explained
From: Chris Martin <windowns@gmail.com>
To: "dev@flex.apache.org" <dev@flex.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ce8e4c24a0d05096c2407

--001a113ce8e4c24a0d05096c2407
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

> I made a minor edit to the small print to include a note that PMC votes
are counted as binding.  Hopefully
> that completes the definition of "Majority Approval" for our group.

Well that was fast.  Hehe, so I thought the "here" link was pointing to the
definition of "Majority Approval", not the voting page.  So my edit doesn't
make sense in that context.  I've removed it :)

Chris

On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 12/4/14, 2:43 PM, "Justin Mclean" <justin@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >> No need for a solution since there is no problem.  What exactly is the
> >> issue you are trying to solve?  Who do you think needs this
> >>clarification?
> >
> >Currently as it reads is that votes on release are "Majority Approval",
> >that's correct/good but not the whole picture. If a committer or user
> >votes on a release they may be this disappointed to find out later that
> >their vote didn't count.
>
> Are you referring to this post? [1]
>
> The poster just thought that non-binding meant he voted against the
> release, not whether his vote counted or not.
>
> -Alex
>
> [1] http://s.apache.org/EVI
>
>

--001a113ce8e4c24a0d05096c2407--