Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B4B210B2B for ; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 16:41:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19761 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2014 16:41:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 19725 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2014 16:41:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 19707 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2014 16:40:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:40:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of omuppi1@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.181 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.181] (HELO mail-vc0-f181.google.com) (209.85.220.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 16:40:33 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id le20so2293837vcb.40 for ; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 08:40:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=Ry9nKJMcOw+bv/3jNUVRiyypSfXFdXdId9q+h81kbIc=; b=dj4VHQzTtNhinhbG4iPUl9dD3PPKwAL+doHiiCS7CZvCOwt0zvR8kbTkoFjOgWzAXx /O2GgowYFReWMl2k0DextXGkunIDO6hZRo4cwUIDK4dDsQtBqH1wfWnHQ/GB/w185cSZ Qy0JRApEZjrNCbR6gUouRc5Dbmzg5T0HAapouUpnfX99pxaJW3eJAkXuHW8182cWspSt vmvnGDQ6MJSogqJ8TrbekYXfMoeLQmWHfu00l5/GiWYUXW+JrBH6dSlDAh3W+jmHjV1j QYaKzX2gqmW0O7rwnJAf1M26oGmJ8svqVuTgswG03ft9P2N5Fr6L2BPIZJaac2LNf7m6 0qzw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.29.172 with SMTP id l12mr21797821vdh.33.1418056832564; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 08:40:32 -0800 (PST) Sender: omuppi1@gmail.com Received: by 10.31.49.203 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 08:40:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.31.49.203 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Dec 2014 08:40:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 08:40:32 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: BNZFMAf3ss4eQUizuWLjxP-sjPE Message-ID: Subject: Re: Release guides on Wiki From: OmPrakash Muppirala To: dev@flex.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30780cb2c6c39a0509b71539 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf30780cb2c6c39a0509b71539 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Thanks for doing this. I don't think there is a need for a vote since there is a general consensus around the contents of the wiki. Obviously, we can tweak the wiki as needed when some new situation arises which has not already been addressed. Thanks, Om On Dec 8, 2014 5:06 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote: > Hi, > > Since it turns out to be not so complicated, I have made some minor > adjustments to the release documentation ([1] and [2]), and moved the > 'A guide to the Apache Flex release process' article (previously known > as the 'less-RC' proposal) to a more accessible location in the wiki. > > The discussion on the process itself has already taken place on this > list and the result is the article in it's current revision. I suggest > we use the usual wiki workflow to correct any mistakes. > > Now, do we vote to codify this? I suggest we don't. If anyone thinks > substantive changes are needed - that have not yet been discussed - > they are free to turn to the dev@ list, and, if no clear majority for > handling it one way or another is clear, start a vote on the proposed > changes. > > EdB > > 1: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/2oH0Ag > 2: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/OQDFAQ > > > > -- > Ix Multimedia Software > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > 3521 VB Utrecht > > T. 06-51952295 > I. www.ixsoftware.nl > --20cf30780cb2c6c39a0509b71539--