From dev-return-43468-apmail-flex-dev-archive=flex.apache.org@flex.apache.org Thu Dec 4 18:59:17 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5423107FD for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 18:59:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84265 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2014 18:59:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 84225 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2014 18:59:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 84213 invoked by uid 99); 4 Dec 2014 18:59:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 18:59:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of omuppi1@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.177] (HELO mail-vc0-f177.google.com) (209.85.220.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 18:58:50 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id ij19so7955643vcb.8 for ; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 10:58:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=/gchGXDzFCRJws6Cnx9Rq+qD6fI2GNwv9WfSSjou6oE=; b=oQddpCjNf1vRalmpFdT4GtMNt2W6GV8KN3NMnREse35M+r8INd3sIKerkY862/zlG5 1fFcIwJgQoxoSpC6VfJeQ1mcHTSOa53GlOVlmQGAjqDk675dvosZT3jhlnlfJNFjGfpy M0/eqkZqkHjv2nGBtbzRBc9iB29wCMEU82dd3umb9g7Ye4JSRT8o93dUlgAMo5AyzDST R4Q0OxQKXBzHcrYOLDGl2yZKNc2gN7fyAhVnHP6YdGxB2N/Ha9mZOYsTSFfBbInRXhcg 7qFtK7I0lMEvlgqDiEEHuZUSfgkJNMNrQ/BiM6pAZ5jtfUcT3ESgzU9sL9VlEmc5B8V5 2RHA== X-Received: by 10.221.58.204 with SMTP id wl12mr6439725vcb.78.1417719528942; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 10:58:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: omuppi1@gmail.com Received: by 10.31.49.203 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 10:58:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: OmPrakash Muppirala Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 10:58:18 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Ex4zzZGu_s2YrQMPD_dYWZL4iXE Message-ID: Subject: Re: Using source version as current Flex SDK To: "dev@flex.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113363a4e9f7480509688c52 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a113363a4e9f7480509688c52 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Om, I think I tried that a while ago and got into a lot of trouble > because those projects in the 'frameworks/projects' folder had so many > dependencies and custom compilation flags, etc. I'm glad you could get > it to run, but I'd like to make the current source a working SDK for > the IDE. > > Yes, you need to spend some time adding the dependent projects, but that is a one time thing. Trust me, it is worth it. This set up lets me so quickly fix issues and add features. I highly recommend this approach :-) The trick is to start with only the projects that you are interested in, and add the dependencies only for that project. It should not take a long time to set up this way. Thanks, Om --001a113363a4e9f7480509688c52--