flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: [4.14] binary vs. source package legal docs
Date Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:57:41 GMT

On 12/29/14, 1:40 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <erik@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:

>>> Can you give me a (realistic) worst case scenario if we were to
>>> release without making any changes?
>> IMO Worse case we can't make a release until this is resolved.
>No, I meant what would happen if we went ahead a binary release
>without fixing this... Tempting, because we did that nearly a dozen
>times without the world coming to an end.

That was my point.  Unless we find out that Saxon has some unfriendly
dependencies, the question of whether a binary dependency in the package
was compiled from sources or not or whether the Installer should ask about
MPL and MIT dependencies probably doesn't put the foundation at risk, so
the worst case is you hit send on the announcement and we hear back at
that moment that there is a rule like that and we have start in on fixing
that, but I would be surprised if we have to pull it back.


View raw message