flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation
Date Fri, 19 Dec 2014 21:12:04 GMT
I’m ok with LICENSE and NOTICE.  I haven’t reviewed README/RELEASE_NOTES
since they are still being worked on.  I don’t know how to review
CONTRIBUTORS, but I would imagine some of our new testers need to go in it.


On 12/19/14, 1:04 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <erik@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:

>So, the nice quiet on this thread means everyone is OK with the
>current state of the legal docs?
>On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:
>> On 12/10/14, 11:25 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <erik@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>>>Alex, did BlazeDS integration fully land, as far as the docs are
>> It seems to be working for me.  It could use more testing.  It would be
>> great if someone took the nightly and tried to follow the README to
>> the source package.
>> Should we mention that we removed the need to download the one BlazeDS
>> in the RELEASE_NOTES?
>> I think I found a error in LICENSE.  I think the MPL shouldn’t be in
>> LICENSE.  I could not find any MPL files in the source package (and
>> shouldn’t be because it is category B and only binaries can be MPL).
>> I am about to pull that out unless someone can explain why it should
>> be in there.  I kept thinking it had to do with OSMF, but OSMF isn’t in
>> the source package either, and there is a sentence at the beginning
>> it applies to most of the directories. In looking at Git/SVN history, my
>> current thinking is that we added it for 4.8 when we had some
>> to-be-donated Adobe source in the package, but now I think everything
>> been donated.
>> Meanwhile, I’m working on putting the OFL license acceptance into the
>> install scripts, but I have to stop for now.
>> -Alex
>Ix Multimedia Software
>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>3521 VB Utrecht
>T. 06-51952295
>I. www.ixsoftware.nl

View raw message