flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [LAST CALL] verification of the SDK documentation
Date Fri, 19 Dec 2014 21:52:18 GMT
I have added a link to the wiki page for Promises.

I found this link [1] for FlatSpark usage.  Can we add this to the
RELEASE_NOTES?  Or is Mahmoud planning on a new wiki page?

It would be nice to have a wiki page for the TLF Tables as well.  Harbs,
any chance you can get something like that up?

Thanks,
Om

[1]
https://github.com/akamud/FlatSpark/wiki/How-to-use-FlatSpark-in-your-project


On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Erik de Bruin <erik@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:

> The README needs a bit about Java (1.)8 and the RELEASE_NOTES will be
> updated with any fixed JIRA tickets, but that's about it. I'd
> appreciate it if you could take a look at them.
>
> Thanks,
>
> EdB
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:
> > I’m ok with LICENSE and NOTICE.  I haven’t reviewed README/RELEASE_NOTES
> > since they are still being worked on.  I don’t know how to review
> > CONTRIBUTORS, but I would imagine some of our new testers need to go in
> it.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 12/19/14, 1:04 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <erik@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> >
> >>So, the nice quiet on this thread means everyone is OK with the
> >>current state of the legal docs?
> >>
> >>EdB
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 12/10/14, 11:25 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <erik@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Alex, did BlazeDS integration fully land, as far as the docs are
> >>>>concerned?
> >>>
> >>> It seems to be working for me.  It could use more testing.  It would be
> >>> great if someone took the nightly and tried to follow the README to
> >>>build
> >>> the source package.
> >>>
> >>> Should we mention that we removed the need to download the one BlazeDS
> >>>jar
> >>> in the RELEASE_NOTES?
> >>>
> >>> I think I found a error in LICENSE.  I think the MPL shouldn’t be in
> >>> LICENSE.  I could not find any MPL files in the source package (and
> >>>there
> >>> shouldn’t be because it is category B and only binaries can be MPL).
> >>>So,
> >>> I am about to pull that out unless someone can explain why it should
> >>>still
> >>> be in there.  I kept thinking it had to do with OSMF, but OSMF isn’t in
> >>> the source package either, and there is a sentence at the beginning
> >>>saying
> >>> it applies to most of the directories. In looking at Git/SVN history,
> my
> >>> current thinking is that we added it for 4.8 when we had some
> >>> to-be-donated Adobe source in the package, but now I think everything
> >>>has
> >>> been donated.
> >>>
> >>> Meanwhile, I’m working on putting the OFL license acceptance into the
> >>> install scripts, but I have to stop for now.
> >>>
> >>> -Alex
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>Ix Multimedia Software
> >>
> >>Jan Luykenstraat 27
> >>3521 VB Utrecht
> >>
> >>T. 06-51952295
> >>I. www.ixsoftware.nl
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ix Multimedia Software
>
> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> 3521 VB Utrecht
>
> T. 06-51952295
> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message