flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] TourDeFlex 1.2 RC2
Date Fri, 28 Nov 2014 06:14:02 GMT
On 11/27/14, 5:43 PM, "Justin Mclean" <justin@classsoftware.com> wrote:

>>> This should be indicated in the new release candidate vote.
>I didn't so the votes were not carried over. I don't think I could go
>back and recto-actively say they did without cancelling this RC and
>making a new one.

Time flies, it’s already been more than a year ago that a board member
suggested that votes could be “carried through” in this post [1].  I’m
saying this mostly to give folks who don’t follow closely some context.

I think the relevant text is this: "One thing you may want to do is
suggest is for the RM to ask the PMC if their VOTEs may be "carried
through", especially in the case of some minor update to a new RC that
doesn't involve a critical bug fix (e.g., an RC only b/c of a
documentation issue, etc.)

I agree that getting the NOTICE right is important, but really, what are
the odds that you and I both missed something again?  I don’t see any
limitations in the above quote on when the RM can ask folks if their votes
can be carried through, so I think you can ask now.


[1] http://s.apache.org/CgC

View raw message