flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: [SDK] during prep phase, switch 'flex-sdk-release' to release branch
Date Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:51:03 GMT
I’ll tweak the installer config for you.  Just remind me when the build
finishes so I can verify the URLs to the artifacts.

On 11/19/14, 8:46 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <erik@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:

>Reacting to both replies:
>
>I have set up another job, ready to go - the Maven Way (tm) :-P - but
>making that new 'release' job's artefacts available to testers through the
>Installer would mean tweaking the Installer config. I'd rather not do
>that,
>I'm trying to keep this release as simple as possible and avoid any
>unnecessary interaction with the Installer.
>
>EdB
>
>
>
>On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Christofer Dutz
><christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>
>wrote:
>
>> How about doing it the maven way? ;-)
>>
>> At the day of the release branch, keep the version in the release branch
>> and increment the version of develop.
>> Create a second Jenkins job. One building the release branch and one the
>> develop. Having the Installer give the user 2 options. "Release Build
>> SNAPSHOT" or "develop SNAPSHOT".
>>
>> Just my 50ct to this ;-)
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> Von: Erik de Bruin <erik@ixsoftware.nl>
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. November 2014 17:01
>> An: dev@flex.apache.org
>> Betreff: [SDK] during prep phase, switch 'flex-sdk-release' to release
>> branch
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm looking for ideas or alternate viewpoints on the following: I plan
>>to
>> switch the 'flex-sdk-release' job, which produces the Nightly Builds, to
>> the release branch, as soon as I cut one for the upcoming release. The
>>idea
>> behind this is that we give testers access to the pre-RC release builds
>> through the Installer, without having to change any settings/configs for
>> the Installer.
>>
>> The develop branch will still be checked through the 'flex-sdk' job, so
>>no
>> developmental protocol will be lost.
>>
>> Does this sound as logical to you as it does to me? Or am I missing
>> something?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> EdB
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>
>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>
>> T. 06-51952295
>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>Ix Multimedia Software
>
>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>3521 VB Utrecht
>
>T. 06-51952295
>I. www.ixsoftware.nl

Mime
View raw message