Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FF1217554 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 02:05:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30394 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2014 02:05:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 30355 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2014 02:05:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 30343 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2014 02:05:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 02:05:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gkptechi@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.176] (HELO mail-wi0-f176.google.com) (209.85.212.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 02:04:48 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hi2so227581wib.3 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 19:04:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=LmXJdU+QkIbr9CFpx0o6M9F1+D/o2nonKDUxYH6Yr7E=; b=GU4xnff/AZIBoPA/D3HWfs8sMmmAbATr+MO+xf3WnXu9KEIxz1F8U5/tbNLF+PjiuL +sJG4x4uaJGbdTbff+Kdr4QAw0svk5HG9bbgIh6NK1vU9tZdCoYkQt0zsh8yxMKRfw6o po5/wt5tc8UcLsKGz1pyCu7LKi+RKiJ7UTc93w5sJSLX48l/Di0DUaPnedgjIsWCaA00 h4UoQuMDTKtKvji9qzthkpOkoqVvxD4dVzXb9tGzP9nWPxeLvIuzhiLJHRTfn69V6T1Y LoAyt81brgSgo7BSPCjasa6r/opLPuyTpbRNpSt/dodokPBtRvSjGeLnXOw3M0D5bquF U+Jw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.91.11 with SMTP id ca11mr16412368wib.45.1413425087639; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 19:04:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.142.211 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 19:04:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1413392677936.74358@c-ware.de> References: <1413392677936.74358@c-ware.de> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 07:34:47 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: AW: AW: Donation of Flexmojos From: Gautam Pandey To: dev@flex.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043c7e7643f6db050580acab X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d043c7e7643f6db050580acab Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Chris, Let me know if I can help in creating new plugin. I can give minimum 2 hours daily for this. Thanks Gautam Thanks & Regards Gautam Pandey On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Christofer Dutz wrote: > We had discussed possibilities of how this could be achieved. > Unfortunately Velo never requested users to officially sign an ICLA. So > they are still in possetion of the rights to that code. In order to donate > this, they would all have to agree. This is an enormous amount of people I > would have to ask. So we dropped this idea. We were thinking about creating > a new plugin here at apache. Unfortunately I have so much stuff to do here > that I can't find any time to work on that ... the skeleton is there though. > > But the GPL of Flexmojos shouldn't have any influence on what you build > with Flexmojos. As far as I know, it would only be problematic, if you > bundled Flexmojos itself with your product. > > Chris > > > ________________________________________ > Von: Gautam Pandey > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Oktober 2014 14:09 > An: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Donation of Flexmojos > > Is there any progress in donating flexmojos to Apache? I am stuck because > of GPL and I cannot go forward and use 6.0.1 as my company is not allowing > to use GPL licensed software. > > Thanks & Regards > Gautam Pandey > > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 1/25/13 7:12 AM, "Greg Reddin" wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:35 AM, christofer.dutz@c-ware.de < > > > christofer.dutz@c-ware.de> wrote: > > > > > >> So ... does this have any impact on the plans to donate? Is it now > > harder > > >> to donate or does it make stuff even easier? > > >> > > > > > > To my knowledge the current licensing strategy of the product has no > > > bearing on its donation. My assumption is that, by donating it, Velo > > > asserts that he has intellectual property rights to the software, and > > he's > > > passing those rights on to Apache. Apache can then relicense the > software > > > if/when we get ready to release it. > > But I would say it means that a donation is now required. My idea of > > having > > you just borrow code from its current repository is now void because you > > cannot borrow GPL code. > > > > Also, there could be some trickiness in that Velo has to be certain that > he > > has the right to re-license the code as Apache license. Whether he does > > that before or after donation may not matter, but effectively, it is > being > > re-licensed. I don't know the GPL terms and what contributor agreement > he > > had, but that might dictate whether he has the authority to re-license. > > > > Finally, do we really have to have this code? How many of us committers > > will actually make changes to and release from this code base? If it > just > > Chris, then I would argue we don't really have a community around it. I > am > > not motivated to work on what has been described as a old monolithic > beast, > > but I would be more willing to help out with the new code for the Apache > > Flex releases. > > > > So, the way I see it, Velo has to re-license to Apache one way or another > > or > > we have to find a way not to copy significant portions of that code. > > > > -- > > Alex Harui > > Flex SDK Team > > Adobe Systems, Inc. > > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > > > > > --f46d043c7e7643f6db050580acab--