Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB1B31741F for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:00:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4787 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2014 11:00:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 4743 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2014 11:00:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 4663 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2014 11:00:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:00:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [162.253.133.43] (HELO mwork.nabble.com) (162.253.133.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:00:00 +0000 Received: from mjoe.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.57]) by mwork.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E07578B1389 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 03:59:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 03:56:09 -0700 (PDT) From: after24 To: dev@flex.apache.org Message-ID: <1414580169818-41910.post@n4.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1414149875606-41774.post@n4.nabble.com> <734d8a36.19902.14942793414.Coremail.darkstone@163.com> <1414311061572-41814.post@n4.nabble.com> <2b3a2fcb.bb0f.1494c4838fe.Coremail.darkstone@163.com> <1414448315998-41883.post@n4.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Scroller optimization MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Jude, /*have you tried setting include in layout to false when setting visible to false?*/ Yes, this property is set to false during scroll operations. It seems that this performance decrease is caused by scout... when scout is off, there is no difference between the two approaches (visible = false or removeElement). So it looks like this optimization is viable :-) I am a bit busy this week but I will add a ticket on the JIRA with a sample application as soon as possible. Thank you. -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/Scroller-optimization-tp41774p41910.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.