flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl>
Subject Re: Working on Falcon
Date Thu, 30 Oct 2014 15:55:42 GMT
I’d keep posting, please. I know I read and try to understand the stuff you
write about. I’ve always been interested in Falcon itself - while working
on FalconJX - but was afraid to enter the dragon’s layer ;-)

Also, with these updates, the original wizards that helped create Falcon
(still on this list) might be interested in giving their opinion, and maybe
even lend a hand …


On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>

> Digging even deeper into Falcon I think that some parts need some cleaning
> up more and more.
> Having a look at the commit comments of the parts I'm talking about
> indicate that noone here has been doing any work on them at all (Still have
> the initial donation commit comment).
> It seems that we have some SWF and some SWC parts Would there be any
> objection to create a "Flash" part which SWC and SWF could extend?
> For example the SWFWriterAndSizeReporter doesn't write anything except the
> size report. So I would like to change this to a FlashSizeReporter and have
> it use a IFlashWriterFactory interface which is extended by a
> ISWCWriterFactory and a ISWFWriterFactory and this way sort of separate the
> tangled up bits of code.
> Another question:
> Should I really discuss this sort of stuff here? I think I could be
> producing quite a bit of mails ... don't want to bore you guys not
> interested in this ;-)
> Chris
> ________________________________________
> Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2014 15:48
> An: dev@flex.apache.org
> Betreff: Working on Falcon
> Hi,
> today I started working on fixing some of the issues I found in falcon. I
> started with first steps in adding advanced telemetry to Falcon.
> As far as I remember the advanced-telemetry option is only available for
> SWF output.
> On my way I noticed that the org.apache.flex.swc.io package contains a
> ISWFWriterFactory and there is no ISWCWriterFactory. I would have expected
> the ISWFWriterFactory to at least be in org.apache.flex.swf.io. As I
> wanted to extend only the SWF output I moved the ISWFWriterFactory to
> swf.io and created a new ISWCWriterFactory in swc.io.
> Unfortunately there seems to be a little mixture of SWC and SWF classes
> called (The SWFWriterAndSizeReporter? is called in the SWC code for
> example).
> Would it be a good idea to clean things up here or is there a reason for
> this being the way it is?
> Chris

Ix Multimedia Software

Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht

T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message