Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB82011DAD for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 13:18:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30935 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2014 13:18:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flex-dev-archive@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 30894 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2014 13:18:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@flex.apache.org Received: (qmail 30856 invoked by uid 99); 2 Sep 2014 13:18:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 13:18:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mihai.chira@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.174] (HELO mail-we0-f174.google.com) (74.125.82.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 13:17:37 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f174.google.com with SMTP id u57so6930536wes.19 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 06:17:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=w5yID5vXayRo8La62HxJa+FGZo+mhukcmBGuifiFO78=; b=mmBpMvrIZvpEgebvf9zast6+zVp2k1CcQVuhAl6HAgOEua+me9+bTvHc9FVoJ9bOA1 S6w0zKxaLAJhmJiI98+a7QBZ/DFLrNEd+Hm3pbFJ36/RczK6E6Bt7cILn7I3usBne+cS m6GAzPUKe3LNI75AM/4xInb3AEbjDJ+k0/oIVvgQ7uASFO8g5DR18JFZH0jUdLVHVq0S XMMzmG5+xJaTHJKbDCMRY1Wu01qT+MZbJPDoHStrlQBwlZhOHa2ZJu6tlVmla/xgTWpg glKyyg05kZOOtqivGhYDH+KhKTouSPka/j0qpPLUrZYUk/mi2sCTp1sx63kWmYFO4hOO JITA== X-Received: by 10.194.200.137 with SMTP id js9mr10339096wjc.90.1409663855750; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 06:17:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.122.130 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 06:17:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1409656970503.46364@c-ware.de> References: <71A3B420-524F-45EE-B6F7-3E47CBB8D228@classsoftware.com> <1409656970503.46364@c-ware.de> From: Mihai Chira Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 14:17:14 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.0 release candidate 0 To: "dev@flex.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org @Chris we tested the normal ANT build of the originally donated code. Sorry that I don't have time to test the new versions. On 2 September 2014 12:22, Christofer Dutz wrote: > @Mihai: Are you testing the Mavenized version or simply the output of the normal ANT build? > > Chris > > ________________________________________ > Von: Mihai Chira > Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. September 2014 12:42 > An: dev@flex.apache.org > Betreff: Re: [DISCUSSION] Squiggly 1.0 release candidate 0 > > I hope so. But from what I remember (and I wasn't the main developer > dealing with this), the flex version of the project depended on > classes inside the non-flex version, which means that if the wrong > compiler argument was used, it would also replace the flex-SpellUI > with the non-flex-SpellUI. But again, things may have changed a lot > since then. > > On 2 September 2014 11:38, Justin Mclean wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> Even if this is not a problem anymore, it might be worth adding a new >>> step to the release verification process to create a project without >>> Flex and make sure that squiggly works well, and the same for a Flex >>> project. >> >> I think this is just a matter of including the right swcs and not all of them? >> >> Thanks, >> Justin