flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: 'Flex Presentation' app on Google Play
Date Mon, 21 Jul 2014 05:25:26 GMT
Ah, thanks for reminding me.  Nobody responded with any other comments.
I'll wait another day before emailing them.

-Alex

On 7/20/14 10:50 AM, "Stephane Beladaci" <adobeflexengineer@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Hi Everyone
>
>I'm curious to know what is the outcome regarding that friendly email. For
>once that someone is usong a blatant copy of the Flex logo and name, for
>commercial purpose, with no disclaimer, I am very surprised that you guys
>are not more aggressive especially after all the hard time given Made in
>Flex. If you do not do anything in the case it will dilute the brand and
>make harder for you to reinforce your intellectual property if this
>happens
>again.
>
>Sincerely,
>Stephane
>On Jun 19, 2014 9:22 AM, "Alex Harui" <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure what "enforce" means.  Maybe we need to agree on what we
>>want
>> to see changed.
>>
>> -Personally, I'm not in favor of letting him use the blue icon.
>> -I am ok with the product name "Flex Presentation"
>> -We want the Google Play store Description to start with "Flex( )
>> Presentation", but I'm ok with the   not being in the title. (My email
>> client is inserting an actual trademark symbol when ever I type capital
>>T
>> and capital M together.  It may not come through when you read it.
>> -We want the Apache attribution at the end of the description
>> -We want his site to use the   symbol after Flex in the description
>> -We want his site to have the Apache attribution at the bottom.
>>
>> Anything else?
>>
>>
>> On 6/19/14 7:19 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <erik@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>>
>> >You said "not enforce a change." I don't agree with that. I do agree
>>with
>> >your suggested approach method (email first, if no action, then
>>consider
>> >options).
>> >
>> >EdB
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Justin Mclean
>><justin@classsoftware.com>
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> > If a bricks and mortar - or rather: mud brick - store would use a
>>blue
>> >> > version of the Adobe logo and call itself "the adobe photo shoppe",
>> >>would
>> >> > that be an infraction on the logo and trademark of Adobe Photoshop?
>> >>I'm
>> >> > sure Adobe's lawyers would think so.
>> >> That certainly would but that not quite the case here. IMO a polite
>> >>email
>> >> first and then if no action we consider what to do next.
>> >>
>> >> Justin
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >Ix Multimedia Software
>> >
>> >Jan Luykenstraat 27
>> >3521 VB Utrecht
>> >
>> >T. 06-51952295
>> >I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>
>>


Mime
View raw message