Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org
Received-SPF: unknown (nike.apache.org: error in processing during lookup of
 aharui@adobe.com)
From: Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com>
To: "dev@flex.apache.org" <dev@flex.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.1 - RC3
Thread-Topic: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.1 - RC3
Thread-Index: 
 AQHPkua1EMcOdEJLa0ioa/ABeGQP75uIJy4A//+YzoCAAHdyAP//kQKAgAB7E4D//5BBgAAfvGqAAAnnFe4AAZO6gAAB1UBS
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 07:04:57 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <fbc3b22865d948efb349d2fcda13f81a@BL2PR02MB500.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CFD429EA.26910%aharui@adobe.com>
 <D8CF3CDF-3792-4DAF-9E52-6AE16AB9A8B4@classsoftware.com>
 <CFD57AA5.26B68%aharui@adobe.com>
 <CAJs+wW2pxJhVKFuTBctS4wvXLOyA_afLcqPkV4xF1bstTLo6gA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CFD581B5.26BE4%aharui@adobe.com>
 <CAJs+wW1VeoEoS_Fg47-RALZ5kDaKedJqXZZL8CAqKMumUMVvrQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CFD58B77.26CA5%aharui@adobe.com>
 <E703B6E5-8CEA-495A-A525-B361793ADDF8@classsoftware.com>
 <c821bb57ddbf47608ad73b70e2fd7210@BL2PR02MB500.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>,<CACK5iZc3kQraLa9vFhV6mRJVOF-tc=fhfanTFHtAY9kijEqX4Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CACK5iZc3kQraLa9vFhV6mRJVOF-tc=fhfanTFHtAY9kijEqX4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

Would the vote be consensus?  If so, it is guaranteed to lose.
If the vote is majority and loses, does that prevent me from using the scri=
pt?  Or sharing with others via some other place other than the repo?

I guess I don't see how we can legislate against individuals using scripts.=
  But I do agree that we don't want to keep arguing this topic.

-Alex
________________________________________
From: omuppi1@gmail.com [omuppi1@gmail.com] on behalf of OmPrakash Muppiral=
a [bigosmallm@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 11:08 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.1 - RC3

On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:

> Again, this script does not decide on the correctness of the
> LICENSE/NOTICE, so every time some one or the same person runs it, there =
is
> the same chance they will catch an error as if they had typed the
> command-line commands themselves.   The script does not vote for you, it =
is
> only intended to increase your efficiency and accuracy in deciding how to
> vote.  And yes, nobody has to use it.
>
>
Let us vote on this verification scripts and formalize it, please.  We
don't want to argue this point during every RC.

Thanks,
Om


> -Alex
> ________________________________________
> From: Justin Mclean [justin@classsoftware.com]
> Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 5:39 PM
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.1 - RC=
3
>
> HI,
>
> > The approval scripts attempt to get you to vote with less hassle.
>
> Again to make clear a script is in no way a replacement for voting. Don't
> get me wrong it's very useful as a basic check and hopefully that will me=
an
> people will vote more. But put it this way, running the script 1000 times
> on a RC by one person or once by 1000 people gives the same results. Woul=
d
> the second really be worth 1000 +1 votes? Do we really think that a scrip=
t
> =3D=3D due diligence?
>=