Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at
 spf.trusted-forwarder.org)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache FlexJS 0.0.2 RC1
From: Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com>
In-Reply-To: <CFC607E6.24842%aharui@adobe.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 09:06:21 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EF583DF7-EBAE-4DB1-A85C-F45D180BAF87@classsoftware.com>
References: <CFC53DBA.24638%aharui@adobe.com>
 <77694515-CB2D-46AD-8F1E-BB094214448A@classsoftware.com>
 <CACK5iZcp54y+6rZG25h6exFfJj76U9gMorKrEeGpAQs2eoxxtw@mail.gmail.com>
 <3A92556E-B204-4059-8365-10F1520DF69B@classsoftware.com>
 <CFC5C07E.24743%aharui@adobe.com>
 <825BBF3D-7C7F-4BAC-BF4F-9A3D13BDE5DB@classsoftware.com>
 <CFC5CAB0.247A1%aharui@adobe.com>
 <22254A2F-8487-4D67-952A-766B4CFF92AF@classsoftware.com>
 <CFC607E6.24842%aharui@adobe.com>
To: dev@flex.apache.org

Hi,

> Meanwhile, using the script or otherwise, can we vote on these =
packages?

Currently I'm considering if I should the veto the checkin(s) or not.
- This approach was not discussed on the mailing list before being =
introduced
- I'm not convinced that the script is enough to provide proper PMC =
oversight
- There's a temptation to just use the script as the sole means to vote =
on releases

Thanks,
Justin