Mailing-List: contact dev-help@flex.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@flex.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at
 spf.trusted-forwarder.org)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+h2A4-wxB6usD7i6F2JMa0N6hjHY8H1UX8=ZamN_OYcRKTvwg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1402313690602-38099.post@n4.nabble.com>
	<1402400119367-38136.post@n4.nabble.com>
	<CA+h2A4_VRKL4DBe+f5N=_nqtKQYgqpiQH1mb1C4q96YNrka7Xw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+h2A4_Hd67JL+4KFJ4MG66qWTx41mxAWipTOZ1w928xpb+ZCA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+h2A4_ns-zhiHXr0eQHct2QhJDOzY0XG9QNK7wxV1Wnz0XJww@mail.gmail.com>
	<5abbf1e0.180.146871dda07.Coremail.darkstone@163.com>
	<CA+h2A4-wxB6usD7i6F2JMa0N6hjHY8H1UX8=ZamN_OYcRKTvwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 23:56:30 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CALorpXcoRAhVc_NsqvuhsQU7AD7knqVd2LZWFhqPBmUaG5UH5A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [Rumor]Adobe will announce something big about Flash Pro on
 2014-06-18
From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski <nicholas@spoon.as>
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2d860c324a604fb9b8bdf

--001a11c2d860c324a604fb9b8bdf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

There are quite a few implementations of WebRTC that exist in Flash/Flex
already.  We do have access to sockets, and WebRTC is essentially PCM=CE=BC=
 data
so it is not too hard to do.  You would just need to do the signaling
parsing (although if you want to use WebRTC with video -- you may be out of
luck since most of the codecs that we being pushed for are not supported in
the Flash Player)

-Nick


On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Nick Collins <ndcollins@gmail.com> wrote:

> Well, presumably the Flash Pro tooling would be updated to provide access
> to those features. For example, in the main timeline perhaps they include
> "layer groups" for each of the stage layers, that I could re-order as I
> choose to. On those timelines, any Stage3D content would exist on that
> layer group, display list content would exists in its layer group, and th=
e
> same for the StageWebView and StageVideo content.
>
> Another cool platform feature would be native support for WebRTC to enabl=
e
> interoperability between Flash clients and native web clients for realtim=
e
> audio/video. I know Flash has RTMFP and RTMP, but honestly, the quality i=
n
> WebRTC, if you're using a compatible browser or plugin, is much higher th=
an
> what Flash provides.
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:50 PM, DarkStone <darkstone@163.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Nick,
> >
> > Well, none of what you said related to the Flash Pro itself.
> >
> > These two wishes I think they only have something to do with the FP/AIR
> > runtimes.
> >
> >
> > What you expect from the Flash Pro tool?
> >
> > DarkStone
> > 2014-06-11
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > At 2014-06-11 02:42:14, "Nick Collins" <ndcollins@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >Another one I would like to see... the ability to programmatically
> control
> > >the layer depth of the various stages.
> > >
> > >
> > >On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Nick Collins <ndcollins@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> How about this one for the wish list... updating Stage3D to be on pa=
r,
> > or
> > >> even surpass, Unity in realtime 3D processing and lighting
> capabilities,
> > >> with native FBX support built into the runtime. That would allow you
> to
> > >> create content in virtually any of the major 3D applications and bri=
ng
> > it
> > >> into your Flash app natively.
> > >>
> >
>

--001a11c2d860c324a604fb9b8bdf--